Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

The Republican candidate challenging New York’s Democratic attorney general Letitia James has voiced strong criticism regarding her endorsement of socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. In an interview with Fox News Digital, he asserted that this relationship jeopardizes the safety and interests of New York voters.
Michael Henry, who is running against James, expressed his views on the matter by highlighting her past associations. He noted that when James first campaigned for the New York City Council, her candidacy did not receive support from the Democratic Party, which led her to run on the Working Family Party line. Henry believes that this pattern of aligning with progressive movements, including support for cashless bail reforms, illustrates significant policy issues for New Yorkers.
James recently spoke at a rally attended by Mamdani’s supporters, where she conveyed a strong message to the crowd of around 3,000. Following an indictment for mortgage fraud, she stated emphatically, “You come for me? You gonna come to all of us!” This public display of solidarity with Mamdani raised eyebrows and stirred debate within the political landscape.
Henry did not hold back in his critique of Mamdani, who many have labeled as a communist. He categorized James’s endorsement as further evidence of her disconnect from the realities facing her constituents. According to Henry, such associations indicate potential long-term challenges for the attorney general.
Henry remarked on James’s introduction of Mamdani on election night, referring to him as her “brother.” He argued that this relationship compromises the well-being of New Yorkers. He added that Mamdani’s lack of traditional employment experience and his previous controversial statements could complicate governance, especially during crises like blizzards or civil unrest.
Pointing to Mamdani’s background as a failed actor, Henry emphasized his perspective that the candidate lacks seriousness for a role that demands robust leadership and decision-making skills. This perception of inadequacy raises questions about the effectiveness of his potential administration.
The competition in this election landscape extends beyond personal grievances. Curtis Sliwa, another GOP contender for mayor in New York City, has proclaimed his intent to become Mamdani’s “worst nightmare” should the Democratic socialist candidate secure a win. This statement captures the heightened tensions surrounding the upcoming mayoral race.
Letitia James has remained steadfast in her support for Mamdani over the past few months. She has referred to him as the leader crucial for New York City’s future. This endorsement comes at a time when Mamdani appears to be leading in the mayoral polls, which brings additional scrutiny to James’s judgment.
Henry contends that James’s political decisions put every New Yorker in jeopardy. He indicated that her alignment with Mamdani represents terrible judgment as she embraces a candidate perceived as radical. Henry believes this could negatively affect the safety and interests of the public.
Henry previously ran against James in 2020, receiving nearly 45 percent of votes—an unprecedented showing for a Republican in New York. He advocates for an “outsider” candidate who can challenge James effectively, underscoring the need for leadership unafraid to confront her authority.
Henry contends that James appears focused on political agendas rather than addressing the pressing issues of New York families. He believes this shift neglects the fundamental role of the New York state attorney general, whose primary duty should be serving the people instead of merely acting as a political enforcer.
With the political landscape constantly evolving in New York, the dynamics between candidates like Henry and James, along with figures like Mamdani, will continue to shape voter sentiment. As the election approaches, the implications of these endorsements and relationships will undoubtedly remain a focal point for discussions among voters and political analysts alike.