Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

In a recent interview, North Carolina Republican Senate candidate Michael Whatley expressed his concerns regarding the deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, known as ICE, in Charlotte and other regions of the state. Whatley attributed this aggression to his Democratic opponent’s history of vetoing legislation that would have mandated local cooperation with the Department of Homeland Security.
ICE, in conjunction with Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, apprehended at least 120 undocumented immigrants in Charlotte before shifting operations to the capital, Raleigh. Officials in Durham, part of the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill Triangle, also reported heightened activity from federal immigration authorities.
Whatley, who hails from Watauga and previously served as the Republican National Committee chairman, pinned the blame on former Democratic Governor Roy Cooper for the perceived collapse of local law enforcement. He stated, “If Roy Cooper had not vetoed legislation that would have forced sheriffs to honor the ICE detainers, then these people would not have been on the street.”
Cooper’s administration saw at least three significant bills rejecting ICE cooperation during his tenure. These vetoes have sparked turbulent debates about the state’s approach to immigration enforcement.
One notable example occurred in August 2019 when Cooper vetoed a proposed bill from current House Speaker Destin Hall, which aimed to compel local sheriffs to honor ICE detainers and hold suspects for federal authorities.
Cooper justified his veto, arguing that the legislation attempted to use fear as a means to divide the citizens of North Carolina. He highlighted that certain legislative initiatives could strain the resources of local law enforcement, as noted by sheriffs in urban areas.
Recent legislative attempts to bolster cooperation with ICE have met resistance. A subsequent bill dubbed ‘ICE 2.0’, co-authored by Hall and state representatives Carson Smith, Jason Saine, and Keith Kidwell, was similarly vetoed in 2022.
However, a persistent effort by the state legislature led to the successful override of Cooper’s veto in 2024, which also included provisions for expanding private-sector school vouchers.
Whatley has indicated that Cooper’s opposition to these legislative initiatives demonstrates his accountability for many illegal immigrants who have remained in North Carolina. He noted that these individuals were only removed from the streets following the recent ICE operations.
A spokesperson for Cooper responded to Whatley’s claims, asserting that sheriffs from counties such as Wake, Mecklenburg, and Durham opposed the Republicans’ proposals. Eight additional sheriffs also supported Cooper’s veto, citing resource constraints as a significant concern.
During these discussions, Cooper emphasized his long-standing commitment to prosecuting violent criminals and maintaining public safety. He asserted that the local sheriffs’ opposition stemmed not only from practical concerns but also from a desire to uphold justice without compromising community resources.
The increased presence of federal immigration enforcement in North Carolina has raised eyebrows, especially as the city of Charlotte faced a surge in its murder rate. With a rise exceeding 200% in certain areas, the implications of these operations loom large over local residents and officials.
Whatley criticized sheriffs from Durham, Wake, and Mecklenburg counties for their reluctance to comply with ICE detainer requests. He asserted, “What we’ve seen are Democrat sheriffs who have refused to honor the ICE detainers and to remove violent criminal illegal aliens from North Carolina.” His comments suggested a desperate need for decisive actions to bolster public safety in the state.
Emphasizing the role of government in protecting citizens, Whatley expressed gratitude towards the Trump administration for its immigration enforcement efforts. He indicated that federal support has become indispensable as state officials grapple with the challenges of local crime.
As the election cycle approaches, the ongoing dispute over immigration and law enforcement policies remains a focal point of contention between candidates. The stark differences in handling illegal immigration and community safety could significantly influence voter sentiments in upcoming races.
With rising crime rates and contentious political dialogue, candidates like Whatley aim to present themselves as tough on crime while scrutinizing the policies and decisions of their opponents. As North Carolina braces for a potentially transformative election, the implications of these issues will undoubtedly shape the discourse in the months ahead.
Report contributed by Fox News Digital’s Kiera McDonald.