Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

As discussions intensify regarding the potential sale of F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, tensions persist surrounding China’s aggressive attempts to acquire American military technology. Retired military experts emphasize that these concerns warrant serious consideration when evaluating the transfer of such advanced aircraft.
Retired General Charles Wald, a former U.S. Air Force officer and deputy commander of the European Command, articulated clear apprehensions during a recent briefing at the Jewish Institute for National Security of America. Wald reflected on the U.S. government’s previous rejections of F-35 requests from both Turkey and the United Arab Emirates, citing fears of technology transfer to China.
Wald stated, “We told Turkey they’re not going to get the F-35. We told the UAE they’re not going to get it because there’s concern that there could be a transfer of technology to China.” He emphasized that the same concerns are likely to influence the decision regarding Saudi Arabia’s procurement of the F-35. However, Wald admitted he does not believe the Saudi government would directly share the technology with the Chinese. Rather, he voiced concerns over indirect exploitation through intelligence operations.
Gordon Chang, a recognized expert on China, underscored the alarming capabilities of Beijing’s intelligence services, which have previously infiltrated U.S. defense networks and programs. “We should assume China has everything already. They already stole the whole plane once. They probably did it again,” Chang reported, highlighting the ongoing risks involved with technology sales.
Strengthening the relationship with Saudi Arabia is also a consideration in this complex equation. Chang argued that Washington should balance the inherent risks with the potential strategic advantages of solidifying ties with the Saudis, especially in light of possible diplomatic advances in the region. He suggested that offering stripped-down versions of the F-35 could maintain a level of cooperation without compromising national security.
Other allies present formidable risks, Chang noted, particularly South Korea. As he detailed, the U.S. must be vigilant regarding Seoul’s potential access to sensitive military technology, which could ultimately end up in Chinese hands.
For years, Chinese intelligence services have been implicated in the theft of advanced American military technologies, covering stealth designs, propulsion systems, and cutting-edge avionics. American officials have consistently linked Chinese cyber operations to several high-profile technology breaches affecting top-tier defense programs, further raising alarms as the U.S. contemplates military sales.
In the context of these concerns, the U.S. government faces a pivotal decision regarding Saudi Arabia’s request for F-35 jets. This request also emerges amid broader negotiations that touch on defense assurances and potential diplomatic conclusions with Israel.
Retired Lieutenant General Robert Ashley, formerly the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, spoke about the stringent monitoring protocols attached to foreign military sales. While these protocols aim to reduce risks associated with advanced military systems, he concedes that they are not foolproof. Ashley stated, “We watch very closely how these kinds of advanced systems are used … but they’re not absolute.”
Despite potential risks, retired military commanders maintain that permitting Saudi Arabia to acquire F-35s would not necessarily compromise Israel’s qualitative military advantage in the region. Wald emphasized that Israeli forces boast a unique level of training and strategic innovation that sets them apart. “There’s a big difference between the Israeli actual pilot capability than the other countries out there,” he noted.
Moreover, Wald emphasized that Israel has incorporated its upgrades to the F-35s, enhancing their performance and effectiveness. He referenced specific developments initiated by Israeli engineers in anticipation of ongoing regional threats.
Should the sale be approved, however, General Wald cautions that the timeline for delivery may span several years, estimating a minimum of five years before Saudi Arabia could expect to receive these advanced jets.
Looking ahead, both Ashley and Wald propose that an increased presence of F-35s in the region could lead to greater situational awareness and fortified collective defense strategies against Iran. Retired Vice Admiral Mark Fox advocated for this perspective, explaining that the F-35’s data-sharing capabilities enable improved overall coalition performance.
Fox stated, “The one thing about F-35 is it talks to every other F-35. Having more F-35s in the region actually increases the capability of the coalition.” This sentiment highlights the potential benefits of allied nations operating these sophisticated aircraft together, fostering closer cooperation in an environment where threats are increasingly complex and multifaceted.
The ongoing discussions surrounding the sale of F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia encapsulate a multifaceted debate that merges military capability with international relations. As experts analyze the risks of technology theft, they acknowledge the delicate balance between fostering alliances and protecting national security interests. Ultimately, the trajectory of this decision could shape the future of U.S. engagement in the Middle East and its implications for regional stability.