Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
In a class at the Army War College in Carlisle, Pennsylvania, I recall a pivotal moment from 2019. As we sat with military officers on the brink of promotion and a few select civilians, the instructor posed a critical question. What represents our greatest national security threat? The answer surprised many—it wasn’t terrorism or nuclear weapons, but rather cyberattacks.
This week, Elon Musk’s platform X (formerly Twitter) revealed the extent of foreign manipulation within social media. By allowing users to identify the country of origin for accounts, Musk exposed a troubling trend. Many deceptive accounts representing American voices were actually based abroad.
For instance, a fake account that dubbed itself “ULTRAMAGA us TRUMPus2028,” complete with American flags in its name, falsely claimed to be located in Washington, D.C., while its origins traced back to Africa. Another now-deleted account, “Trump Is My President,” was sourced from Macedonia. Even the patriotic handle @American, featuring a bald eagle over an American flag, was ultimately revealed to be based in South Asia.
The 2016 election aftermath starkly illustrated how malicious foreign entities utilized fake accounts to create discord. A notable instance from the Mueller Report demonstrated this when a Russian-operated account organized an actual political rally in the United States.
In a prior column, I discussed the targeted influence on the MAGA movement, emphasizing how foreign adversaries have sought to fragment this group. Such fake accounts can foster a perception of influence through likes and shares, while also facilitating financial support for problematic users via monetization.
The alarming reality is that our nation remains particularly susceptible to information attacks, a consequence of valuing freedom of expression above safety. This paradox stands out, given our military, economic, and diplomatic dominance on the global stage.
For example, consider China’s approach to information control. The Chinese government would never allow foreign exposure to unchecked propaganda aimed at its citizens, as seen with platforms like TikTok. Even if banned, alternatives would likely join the fray, driven by the challenges posed by the First Amendment.
Addressing these foreign information operations Fgoing forward, a well-informed public stands out as our best defense. Solutions are scarce, making public awareness vital.
Given our democratic principles, government intervention to shield citizens from deceitful foreign actors, who may pose as local individuals, remains limited. Thus, Musk’s introduction of country-of-origin labeling for accounts serves as a substantial step forward in combating these threats.
However, merely having access to such information is insufficient. We must each commit to vigilance online, consistently questioning the authenticity of our interactions. Recognizing that what we encounter online might be deceptive is paramount, as it could lead to harm for both ourselves and our nation.
This ongoing responsibility might feel overwhelming. Still, it stems from the essence of freedom and the inherent uncertainties it presents. Learning to identify key indicators of misinformation is essential.
When confronted with claims that a particular influencer holds immense sway over their followers, one should reflect on their real-world influence. Have they hosted live events? Is there any mention of them in personal discussions? Such reflections can reveal the extent of their credibility.
Next, consider who stands to gain from the heightened distrust and ongoing discord sown by these influencers. The most probable beneficiaries include adversarial nations like Russia, China, and Iran.
Reflecting back on my instructor’s insights at the Army War College, I am confident he would commend Musk for implementing country-of-origin labels as a significant countermeasure to foreign information operations. Yet he’d insist on our collective responsibility to remain alert and discerning online.
Ultimately, a fundamental truth prevails: most of our fellow citizens are indeed good and well-meaning individuals. When our online experiences suggest otherwise, a healthy skepticism is warranted. After all, our adversaries will not cease in their attempts to exploit our vulnerabilities in the information space.
