Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Last month, Google officially discontinued remote control capabilities for the first and second generation Nest Learning Thermostats. Many users believed that with the removal of these features, the devices would cease communication with Google. However, new findings indicate otherwise.
Security researcher Cody Kociemba discovered that these older Nest devices continue to send detailed sensor logs to Google, raising significant questions about user privacy and data transparency. This unexpected revelation sheds light on the ongoing data flow from devices even after they lose official support.
Kociemba’s investigation into this continuous data transfer was part of a repair bounty initiative by FULU, a right-to-repair organization established by electronics repair expert Louis Rossmann. The challenge aimed to revive functionalities of outdated Nest devices that Google no longer supports.
While working to clone Google’s API for his project, Kociemba experienced an influx of logs from customer devices. This unexpected data surge spurred him to conduct a deeper analysis of the data Google continues to collect.
Even without remote control capabilities, Kociemba found that early Nest Learning Thermostats are still transmitting a consistent stream of sensor data. This data includes:
The volume of logs generated was surprising. Kociemba disabled the incoming data streams, unprepared for these devices to remain connected to Google’s servers after receiving the shutdown notice.
In previous statements, Google mentioned that unsupported models would continue to send logs for diagnostic purposes. However, Kociemba emphasized that since customer support for these devices has been entirely discontinued, the rationale behind this persistent data collection is puzzling.
In response to inquiries about the ongoing data transfer, a Google spokesperson commented that the Nest Learning Thermostat (1st and 2nd Gen) no longer receives support in the Nest and Home applications. Nevertheless, users can still adjust temperature and schedules directly on the device. According to the statement, diagnostic logs are not tied to specific user accounts and are necessary for service tracking.
While Google has severed access to remote control, security updates, and software enhancements through its applications, Nest Thermostat users find themselves in a conundrum. These devices continue to transmit data, forming a one-sided connection that appears to favor Google’s data collection over user privacy.
Due to discontinued support, users cannot gain any benefits from these uploaded logs. Google is unable to utilize the data for diagnostics or customer assistance, further complicating the situation. This raises critical questions regarding user consent and their expectations of privacy.
FULU’s bounty program promotes community-driven repair projects that revitalize features in devices abandoned by their manufacturers. After their submission review, FULU awarded Kociemba and another developer, known as Team Dinosaur, the top bounty of $14,772 for successfully restoring smart functionalities to legacy Nest models.
This initiative showcases the impact of collaborative efforts in keeping useful devices operational. It also brings to light how tech companies manage device data long after support has ceased.
For those who still operate unsupported Nest thermostats, there are several strategies to protect personal privacy. Implementing these measures can help reduce the amount of data sent to Google and minimize overall exposure:
The alarming realization that older Nest thermostats continue to send data to Google after the suspension of their smart features compels users to reassess how their connected devices operate. Unsupported devices can still maintain communication with their manufacturers, even when their utility has diminished. Understanding the data exchanges of these gadgets assists users in making informed decisions about their connected home environments.
Many users may now question whether they would keep using a device that persistently shares information with its manufacturer, especially once it ceases to provide valuable services. Insights gained from such discoveries lead to vital conversations about transparency, data rights, and user privacy in an increasingly connected world.
In light of these concerns, a growing call for user rights in tech device management is evident. Consumers deserve clarity regarding what data is shared and how it is used. Empowering users with better options can lead to more informed choices about the devices they use and the level of data they wish to share.