Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

A federal investigation has led to serious charges against a Detroit judge and three accomplices for their alleged involvement in a prolonged scheme aimed at defrauding incapacitated and vulnerable individuals. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Michigan detailed these allegations, highlighting the gravity of the situation.
Andrea Bradley-Baskin, a 46-year-old district judge serving on Michigan’s 36th District Court, is accused of massively abusing her judicial position for personal gain. Allegations state that she misappropriated approximately $70,000 from a ward’s funds to acquire an ownership interest in a local bar. Furthermore, it is claimed she used funds embezzled from a ward’s estate to cover the lease payments on a new Ford Expedition.
U.S. Attorney Jerome Gorgon expressed deep concern over the situation, stating, “We respect the authority that covers a black robe. This state judge and her cronies allegedly abused that high honor for personal gain by preying on the needy protected by the court. This would be a grievous abuse of our public trust.”
He emphasized that nobody, regardless of their societal position, is above the law. Jennifer Runyan, Special Agent in Charge of the FBI Detroit Field Office, echoed this sentiment, saying, “These four defendants allegedly conspired to steal from some of our most vulnerable citizens, looting bank accounts, exploiting legal authority, and profiting off those who relied on them for care and protection.”
Along with Bradley-Baskin, those charged include Nancy Williams, 59, Avery Bradley, 72, and Dwight Rashad, 69, all of whom reside in Detroit. Each individual faces charges of conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Additionally, the indictment contains specific charges against Bradley for wire fraud and multiple counts of money laundering against Bradley, Bradley-Baskin, and Rashad. Bradley-Baskin also faces a single count of making a false statement to federal law enforcement authorities.
As of now, attorneys representing Bradley-Baskin have not commented on the ongoing investigation. The U.S. Attorney’s Office pointed out that, according to the indictment, probate courts frequently appoint guardians and conservators to oversee the financial and personal affairs of adults, designated as wards, who have been deemed incapable of doing so.
The indictment further specifies that Nancy Williams owned Guardian and Associates, an agency selected by the Wayne County Probate Court as a fiduciary for incapacitated wards in over 1,000 cases. Avery Bradley, an attorney, along with his daughter Andrea Bradley-Baskin, ran a law firm that often represented Guardian and Associates in Wayne County Probate Court. The duo is noted for their consistent presence in the court, practicing regularly.
Moreover, Dwight Rashad managed various group homes and residential facilities catering to elderly individuals, including the wards who required support and care. Through their alleged actions, the four defendants systematically embezzled funds from the wards, unlawfully obtaining and retaining money rightfully belonging to those individuals and their estates.
In one particular incident highlighted by prosecutors, Bradley, Williams, and Rashad allegedly diverted around $203,000 from a legal settlement belonging to a ward, with none of that money benefiting the ward in any way. Williams purportedly paid Rashad rent for wards who did not even reside in one of his properties, showcasing the depth of the alleged fraud.
The ongoing investigation is being conducted by the FBI in conjunction with the Internal Revenue Service’s Criminal Investigations unit. Both agencies are taking this matter very seriously, given the nature of the offenses and the impact on the vulnerable populations involved.
This case raises significant legal and ethical questions concerning the accountability of those in positions of power, particularly regarding their responsibilities towards the vulnerable. The actions attributed to these individuals not only undermine the integrity of the judicial system but also pose a dire reflection on the potential for exploitation within guardianship arrangements.
As the investigation unfolds, the legal ramifications for those involved may serve as a cautionary tale about the importance of safeguarding the rights of incapacitated individuals. Stakeholders in the legal community and advocates for vulnerable populations will undoubtedly be watching closely as the situation develops.
The alleged exploitation of trust and responsibility vested in guardians and conservators puts the public’s confidence in the legal system to the test. It emphasizes the urgent need for stricter oversight and reforms in the system designed to protect the most vulnerable members of society. Public reassurance may hinge on the outcomes of this case and the actions taken thereafter to ensure such abuses do not occur in the future.
Investigators and legal experts are increasingly advocating for reform to prevent similar incidents. They argue that enhancing transparency and accountability in the guardianship process should be a priority, especially in light of such stark violations of trust.
As authorities continue to assess the extent of these alleged crimes, the community is reminded of the importance of vigilance and oversight in safeguarding the interests of those who cannot protect themselves. This case serves as a crucial reminder of the duty owed to vulnerable individuals and the paramount importance of ethical conduct among those entrusted with their care.