Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Flick International Worn-out goalposts on a barren school sports field with a crumpled jersey symbolizing gender controversy in sports

San Antonio School Employee Claims Parents Cause Issues in Women’s Sports Debate

San Antonio School Employee Claims Parents Cause Issues in Women’s Sports Debate

A recent video surfaced on social media platform X, featuring a worker from the San Antonio Independent School District making controversial remarks about parents and their role in the ongoing debate over transgender athletes in women’s sports.

Arthur Elizondo, identified as a constituent specialist on the San Antonio Independent School District’s website, allegedly stated that parents are responsible for creating problems when it comes to biological boys competing in girls’ sports. This statement emerged from a video posted Wednesday by Corey DeAngelis, a senior fellow at the American Culture Project.

In the video, an undercover journalist approached Elizondo, posing as a mother of a biological boy who had transitioned to female and wanted to compete in girls’ sports.

Delving into Controversial Conversations

While interacting with the undercover journalist, who is associated with Accuracy in Media, an investigative journalism outlet, Elizondo faced questions about the process of allowing a biological boy to participate in girls’ sports.

After the journalist mentioned her intention to submit an altered birth certificate, Elizondo replied, “I don’t think anybody’s going to raise any problems with that.” This exchange raises significant questions about the policies surrounding transgender participation in sports.

Parents as the Root of the Issue

The undercover journalist described her “child” wanting to transition from being a biological boy. She claimed, “Her friends knew and it wasn’t a problem, it was the parents that created a problem for her.” In response, Elizondo affirmed her perspective, saying, “Sure, that’s who creates all the problems.” This interaction has ignited further discussions about parental roles in the evolving landscape of youth sports.

Engagement with Accuracy in Media

After the uncomfortable exchange, Elizondo was confronted by Adam Guillette, the president of Accuracy in Media. When pressed for clarification regarding his earlier remarks, Elizondo reportedly retreated, saying, “No, I’m not going to say anything! I don’t know any of you guys! I don’t know what you’re talking about.” At one point, the tension escalated as Elizondo appeared to physically push Guillette while trying to escape into another room.

Fox News Digital reached out to Elizondo for comments, as well as to the San Antonio Independent School District and Dr. Jaime Aquino, the district superintendent. However, no immediate responses were forthcoming.

Historical Context and Policy Developments

This incident unfolds against a backdrop of heightened scrutiny of transgender policies in sports. On February 5, 2025, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order aimed at prohibiting biological males from competing in girls’ and women’s sports. The order asserts that it is the policy of the United States to revoke funding from educational programs that compromise fair athletic opportunities for women and girls.

The executive order emphasizes the importance of safety, fairness, dignity, and privacy for female athletes. Echoing these sentiments, the order claims that participation of biological males in women’s sports undermines these critical values.

A Call to Action from Advocacy Groups

Commenting on the video that captured Elizondo’s remarks, Corey DeAngelis expressed outrage at the implications of his comments. He stated, “It’s beyond parody that this administrator works for the Office of Family Engagement when he says parents are the problem.” Such comments highlight a disconnect between school administration perspectives and parental concerns.

Furthermore, DeAngelis pointed out that this situation is not isolated to Texas, asserting that “woke indoctrination isn’t just a blue state problem.” He highlighted that this incident marks the fifth Texas school district exposed in recent weeks for similar approaches to circumventing Texas laws that protect girls’ sports through loopholes, such as modifying birth certificates.

The Ongoing Debate on Parental Choice

DeAngelis argues that parents must be empowered to choose schools that align with their values, advocating for school choice as a means to enhance family engagement. He suggests that educational institutions should respect parental wishes to create an environment conducive to student well-being.

This contentious issue continues to evoke passionate responses from various stakeholders, ranging from parents to advocacy groups, as they navigate the complex terrain of sports, gender identity, and education policies. As discussions around these subjects remain largely polarized, both supporters and opponents of transgender athletes in girls’ sports are unlikely to reach a consensus soon.

Engagement and Future Considerations

The situation in San Antonio is just one example of the many challenges emerging within the realm of youth sports. Stakeholders must consider the ramifications of policies and administrative attitudes towards parental involvement and student participation in athletics. Observers will need to watch how this unfolding story influences future decisions at the local, state, and national levels.