Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Flick International Abstract representation of the U.S. Department of Education being dismantled with educational elements and a turbulent ocean

Trump Takes Bold Step to Reshape Education by Disbanding Department

Trump Takes Bold Step to Reshape Education by Disbanding Department

Education experts have responded positively to President Donald Trump’s executive order that effectively disbands the Education Department. This decisive action, announced on Thursday, aims to transfer educational responsibilities back to individual states, a move that many believe is long overdue.

Expert Opinions on the Executive Order

Nicole Neily, the President and Founder of Parents Defending Education, expressed strong support for the decision. She stated, “It’s past time for a radical rethink of how education is administered in this country, because we cannot keep propping up a failing system.” Neily’s remarks highlight the prevailing sentiment that the current educational framework needs significant reform.

Historical Context of the Decision

In his announcement, Trump emphasized that the executive order represents a historic milestone. He noted that it has been 45 years in the making, referring to the conservative movement that has sought to dismantle the Education Department since the tenure of former President Ronald Reagan. This longstanding Republican perspective advocates for reduced federal oversight in education, contesting the effectiveness of centralized control.

The Call for Education Reform

Trump argued that educational spending has increased without corresponding improvements in student achievement. Neily reinforced this view, stating, “The numbers don’t lie – over the past 45 years, per pupil spending has skyrocketed while achievement has plummeted.” Her comments suggest that many believe the entrenched bureaucracy has failed American children, benefiting only a select group of administrators and activists.

Support for School Choice Initiatives

Tommy Schultz, CEO of the American Federation for Children, stated that Trump’s executive order continues his pledge to reform education. He emphasized the urgent need for Congress to pass school choice legislation. Schultz argued, “Now it is time for Congress to send school choice legislation to his desk so that he can fulfill his other mandate to the voters.” This call for action underscores a widespread desire among supporters for increased options for parents and students.

The Role of Parent Advocacy Groups

Moms for Liberty, a pro-parent political advocacy group, seized upon Trump’s announcement as a pivotal opportunity to influence the future of education. They encouraged parents and local communities to exert more control, stating in a post on X, “This is an incredible chance to empower parents and local communities to take charge of education, instead of letting Washington bureaucrats make the decisions!” This perspective reflects a growing movement advocating for parental rights in educational matters.

Addressing Educational Challenges

The White House pointed to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) scores, which indicate a crisis in student performance, as a rationale for dismantling federal oversight. Harrison Fields, the White House principal deputy press secretary, commented, “NAEP scores reveal a national crisis — our children are falling behind.” He attributed some of the struggles to the prior administration’s policies that allegedly overwhelmed school resources.

The Need for Immediate Action

Margaret Spellings, President and CEO of the Bipartisan Policy Center, voiced her concerns about the education system’s state. She noted, “Parents and students are deeply frustrated by the state of our education system.” Spellings connected the executive order with a pressing need to address declining NAEP math and reading scores, urging immediate action.

Funding and Program Preservation

Despite plans to dismantle many aspects of the Education Department, Trump’s order ensures that essential programs will continue. Title I funding, resources for students with disabilities, and Pell Grants will be preserved, alleviating concerns about the negative impacts of disbanding the department.

The Challenge Ahead for Implementation

According to Spellings, the commitment to maintain funding for beneficial programs is a welcome proposition. However, she cautioned that recent layoffs at the department present challenges in keeping those promises. Spellings asserted, “The hard work begins now among Congress, the Trump Administration, and families to determine how best to serve students.” This statement indicates an awareness of the complexities involved in such a significant overhaul.

Path to Disbanding the Department

Trump’s executive order sets in motion steps to begin dismantling the Education Department, yet it cannot be entirely abolished without Congressional action. Changing the legal framework that established the department requires coordinated efforts from lawmakers. This highlights the ongoing legislative challenges that may arise in pursuit of educational reform.

Looking to the Future of Education

The recent executive order marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing conversation surrounding education in America. As states gear up to take on greater responsibility, stakeholders will be closely watching how these changes impact educational outcomes. Advocates for reform hope that the shift in power will lead to a more effective and responsive education system, truly benefiting students across the nation.