Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
EXCLUSIVE REPORT: A new study from the Capital Research Center uncovers alarming trends within pro-Palestinian groups, revealing a staggering 186% increase in anti-American and anti-police rhetoric since the attacks on Israel on October 7th. The study highlights a shocking 3,000% surge in calls for violence during the same period.
The pro-Palestinian movement, particularly active on college campuses, has transformed into a platform that not only expresses discontent towards Israel but also advocates for radical views against American values and law enforcement. Ryan Mauro, an investigative researcher associated with the study, emphasized that the rhetoric now promotes terrorism and sedition within the U.S.
The analysis scrutinized numerous social media posts from 496 highly active pro-Palestinian groups and individuals. The term pro-Palestinian remains encased in quotation marks throughout the study, reflecting the researchers’ skepticism about the actual intentions of these organizations. Notably, many of these groups are linked to charities and nonprofits benefiting from federal funding.
This movement has become a long-lasting fixture, poised to adapt and exploit various social issues while embedding messages of anti-Americanism and anti-Israel sentiment. The study predicts that the group’s influence will persist, even as the focus on Israeli-Palestinian conflicts wanes.
In an exhaustive comparison of posts on platforms like X, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, and Telegram before and after October 2023, researchers identified 14 keywords associated with hatred towards the United States government and its laws. Terms such as American imperialism and defund the police were prevalent and illustrated an ongoing campaign to undermine U.S. societal structures.
Mauro conveyed, “Following October 7, we documented a dramatic escalation in violent rhetoric. Most notably, the targets of this violence have been the U.S. and law enforcement agencies. Furthermore, we noted a significant upsurge in anti-American sentiment.” He asserted that this movement transcends mere pro-Palestinian advocacy, positioning itself firmly against American principles.
The study further revealed a concerning pattern where anti-Israel tropes intertwine with anti-American themes. Mauro asserted, “They harbor animosity towards the United States not just due to its ties with Israel, but rather out of a deep-seated hate towards the nation itself.”
The research concludes that pro-Palestinian groups not only deny Israel’s right to exist, but display a similar disdain towards U.S. sovereignty. Organizations involved in this movement often accuse both nations of being imperialist entities.
The study disclosed additional troubling remarks made by members of these groups. Activists frequently proclaim that Israel must cease to exist and that the United States should dissolve its borders, which they term as colonial.
Capital Research Center highlighted a dangerous narrative where American law enforcement is equated with Israel’s military forces, portraying both as oppressive occupiers. Mauro warned that this rhetoric poses a significant threat, noting that many organizations openly support violent actions against the Israel Defense Forces (IDF).
“The rising wave of violent rhetoric signifies a troubling environment for Americans. We must question if we desire a future resembling the violence that Israelis confront regularly, where acts of violence and harassment become normalized,” Mauro cautioned.
Interestingly, the research exposed how pro-Palestinian groups often receive taxpayer funding, particularly in college environments. Mauro noted that approximately 30 of the scrutinized groups were affiliated with college campuses and utilized budgets sourced from taxpayer dollars.
This system implicates taxpayers in the funding of organizations promoting anti-American or pro-terrorism sentiments. Mauro explained that university budgets, often subsidized by taxpayer money, occasionally finance these maligned groups, leading to concerning dynamics on campuses.
The study sheds light on the specific makeup of the analyzed groups. Out of 78 entities and 30 activists assessed for their speech, 35 were identified as college chapters belonging to national organizations. Additionally, two groups operated as social welfare nonprofits, while an unknown number were classified as charities.
The study warns that charities or nonprofits associated with pro-Palestinian groups that promote violent or anti-American ideologies may face serious legal repercussions, including the potential loss of tax-exempt status.
Mauro underscored the productive action that can be taken: “The IRS holds the key to dismantling support for these movements. By educating the Treasury Department and the IRS about these violating groups, we can significantly reduce their fundraising abilities and, consequently, their threat levels.”
Ultimately, the study characterizes the pro-Palestinian movement as fundamentally anti-American, anti-Western, and increasingly inclined towards violence. Despite acknowledging that some supporters may not align with these views, the authors point to a consistent message propagated by the movement’s leadership and top organizations.
The findings urge a closer examination of the rhetoric dominating the pro-Palestinian narrative, as it challenges the foundations of American societal values.