Illinois Woman Sues Abortion Provider After Disturbing Medical Incident

An anonymous woman has initiated a rare medical negligence lawsuit in Illinois against an abortion provider after a late-term abortion resulted in alarming complications. The woman discovered that parts of a deceased fetus remained in her body following the procedure, forcing her to seek emergency medical attention.

Details of the Lawsuit

The plaintiff, referred to as Jane Doe, filed the lawsuit through Chicago injury attorney Richard Craig. The complaint names Equity Clinic, based in Champaign, and its founder, Dr. Keith Reisinger-Kindle, as defendants. This case marks a significant incident considering the increasing scrutiny surrounding abortion practices.

Claims of Medical Negligence

The lawsuit alleges that during a 22-week abortion performed in April 2023, Reisinger-Kindle failed to remove all fetal tissue, leading to severe complications for the woman. After experiencing persistent cramping post-procedure, Doe sought help at an emergency room where medical personnel discovered remnants of a deceased fetus. This discovery has raised serious questions about the standard of care provided during the procedure.

Attorney’s Perspective

Craig expressed his astonishment at the details of this case, stating that such circumstances are extremely rare. He highlighted a specific note made by Reisinger-Kindle, which claimed that all ‘products of conception’ had been thoroughly inspected and confirmed to be complete. Craig contradicted this assertion, pointing out the discrepancies in medical records that suggest otherwise.

Emergency Room Findings Raise Alarms

Upon her admission to the emergency room, medical staff described finding what they identified as half of a deceased fetus. According to imaging records included with the lawsuit, it appeared more likely that approximately two-thirds of the fetus remained in the woman’s body. This critical oversight raises severe questions about the practices followed by the defendants during the abortion.

Chain of Communication Issues

Additionally, Doe, who is a mother of four, claims that Reisinger-Kindle did not provide vital information to the attending surgeons, which hindered their ability to offer appropriate care. This alleged breach of communication is particularly troubling in a medical context, where patient safety and informed consent are paramount.

Expert Opinion on Standard of Care

The lawsuit includes a medical report from an obstetrician-gynecologist that suggests Reisinger-Kindle deviated from standard medical practices. The report indicates that he perforated the woman’s uterus during the procedure and failed to recognize or address this injury.

Further Examination Issues

According to the expert report, there was a considerable hole in Doe’s uterus, approximately the size of a large coin. It noted that had Reisinger-Kindle performed a thorough examination of the fetal remains, it should have been immediately apparent that not all tissue had been removed. This oversight has prompted even further scrutiny of the abortion practice in question.

Impact of Recent Legal Changes

The recently overturned Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision has led to shifting legal frameworks concerning abortion in various states. In the aftermath of that landmark ruling, Illinois has positioned itself as a refuge for those seeking abortion services. The state’s legislative measures appear to prioritize the protection of healthcare providers and patients, making lawsuits like this increasingly complex.

Provider’s Background and Reputation

Reisinger-Kindle has been active in the Midwest abortion scene, establishing himself as a prominent figure following the recent changes in abortion law. His involvement in various clinics has come under scrutiny as complications arise from the procedures performed.

Concerns About Pain Management

Craig has also raised ethical concerns about the manner in which the abortion was conducted. He argues that Reisinger-Kindle did not provide any pain relief to the fetus before dismemberment. Craig asserted that current laws limit the ability to hold providers accountable for the suffering of a fetus during such procedures, presenting a controversial aspect of medical ethics relating to late-term abortions.

Calls for Accountability

The case has attracted significant attention as it unfolds. Observers are particularly interested in how the legal framework will respond to claims of medical negligence in this context. The expectations for accountability are high, as the plaintiff seeks damages for emotional distress and medical negligence from a situation that can be described as profoundly distressing.

Awaiting a Response

Fox News Digital has reached out to Reisinger-Kindle for further comment but has received no response following the publication of this article. The case continues to develop as it enters the legal system.

Understanding the Consequences

This lawsuit not only underscores the operational challenges within abortion clinics but also reflects the broader societal debates surrounding reproductive healthcare. As the legal landscape surrounding abortion evolves, cases like this one highlight the importance of maintaining high standards within medical practices to ensure patient safety and trust in medical professionals.