Bryan Kohberger’s College Essay Reveals Insights into Crime Scene Investigation Techniques

Bryan Kohberger’s College Essay Reveals Insights into Crime Scene Investigation Techniques

Idaho prosecutors have recently disclosed a college essay written by Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in a high-profile murder case. This revelation comes from new court filings, which highlight Kohberger’s understanding of crime scene protocols.

In the essay, composed during his 2020 finals for a criminal justice course, Kohberger discusses essential practices employed by crime scene investigators. He notes the importance of using ‘fiber-free’ overalls, gloves, and booties to prevent the contamination of crime scenes with DNA and fingerprints.

The investigation into Kohberger is linked to the tragic events at 1122 King Road, where four University of Idaho students were allegedly killed in November 2022. Though evidence has been scant, police have indicated that a Ka-Bar knife sheath found at the scene reportedly contained Kohberger’s DNA. Initially, law enforcement did not identify him until the FBI connected him through investigative genetic genealogy.

Understanding Crime Scene Protocols

Kohberger’s essay elaborates on various aspects of crime scene investigations. He emphasizes the meticulous measures law enforcement must undertake to preserve the integrity of a crime scene. Notably, he expresses concerns regarding circumstantial evidence and identifies domestic partners as often the prime suspects. Kohberger also acknowledges that crime scenes could be staged, a point that has not been overlooked by legal experts.

Joseph Giacalone, a former NYPD cold case investigator and a professor of criminal justice, remarked on how Kohberger’s writings could be used against him in court. He stated that prosecutors would underscore Kohberger’s detailed knowledge of crime scene investigation techniques, including his specific mention of ‘fiber-free’ clothing.

The Implications of Kohberger’s Insights

Kohberger’s mention of protective gears such as fiber-free overalls, shoe covers, gloves, and hair nets indicates a comprehensive understanding of crime scene preservation protocols. Giacalone pointed out that this information is unlikely to benefit Kohberger’s defense.

Giacalone further analyzed Kohberger’s understanding of crime scene investigation and its potential implications for the case. He suggested that the knowledge expressed in the essay could provide insight into why there has been little forensic evidence left at the crime scene, a significant aspect that attorneys could leverage during the trial.

Discrepancies and Missteps

Interestingly, Giacalone identified flaws in Kohberger’s assertions. For instance, Kohberger claimed that staging a crime scene is common, which contradicts seasoned investigators’ knowledge that most incidents result from mistakes or panic rather than calculation. In addition, Giacalone expressed skepticism regarding Kohberger’s ability to stage a crime scene post-incident, given the rapid succession of events and an eyewitness encounter.

Legal Perspectives

As Kohberger’s trial approaches, his essay may play a pivotal role in the legal deliberations. He has claimed through his defense that potentially significant blood and DNA evidence could indicate alternate suspects. In his essay, he argues that it is not the responsibility of crime scene investigators to unearth potentially planted evidence. He states, ‘Even if there was an item introduced to the scene by an offender to throw off investigators, it is not the job of the criminal investigator processing the crime scene to jump to conclusions.’

Giacalone offered a critical review of the essay, suggesting that although Kohberger demonstrates substantial knowledge, simply learning theories from academic texts differs significantly from practical application. He shared that if Kohberger had submitted this piece for a college assignment, he might grade it a B.

A Look at Kohberger’s Background

Kohberger holds a master’s degree from DeSales University and is now pursuing a Ph.D. in criminology at Washington State University, located just ten miles from the site of the alleged crime. At approximately 4 a.m. on November 13, 2022, Kohberger allegedly entered the residence of six students and carried out the attacks on four individuals: Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves, both 21, as well as 20-year-olds Xana Kernodle and Ethan Chapin. The three women shared an apartment, while Chapin resided nearby and was romantically involved with Kernodle.

Upcoming Trial Details

Kohberger faces multiple charges, including four counts of first-degree murder and one count of burglary. His trial is set to begin on August 11, 2023, with jury selection scheduled for July 30. Previously, a judge had entered not-guilty pleas on Kohberger’s behalf during his arraignment in May 2023. If convicted, he could face the death penalty.

Looking Ahead

The implications of this case extend beyond the courtroom, touching on broader themes of criminal investigation and the evolving dynamics of forensic science. As the trial date approaches, all eyes remain on the proceedings. With legal experts analyzing the nuances of Kohberger’s essay, it is clear that the outcome could hinge on this complex interplay of knowledge and practice in the realm of criminal justice.