Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Police Officers in New York Targeted by Fines Following Alleged Strike
In a contentious situation, multiple officers from a small-town police department in New York, located near the Canadian border, find themselves facing significant fines. These penalties stem from accusations of participating in an unauthorized labor strike during a harsh winter period filled with persistent snowfall.
The police union representing these officers contends that the fines serve as retaliation and represent an abuse of the authority felt by the officers, effectively denying them their due process rights.
Allegations of Misconduct and Accusations of False Claims
One of the officers involved firmly rejects the allegations, asserting he reported to work, engaged in on-duty training, and even handled a drunk driving stop while weather conditions were abysmal. Andy Thompson, a Tonawanda Police officer also serving as the president of the department’s union, articulated frustrations, stating, “They are upset that we didn’t generate enough revenue through traffic tickets to meet their perceived quotas.”
Official Responses to the Claims
Tonawanda Police Chief James Stauffiger stands by the charges against the union, declaring Thompson’s claims to be “without merit.” Stauffiger emphasized the need for a fair and thorough process. Thompson counts among nearly 50 officers accused of striking without authorization for one hour daily over a nine-day span, facing a deduction of two hours of pay for each of those days, as outlined in a letter from Tonawanda Town Supervisor Joe Emminger.
Amidst this turmoil, Thompson insists on the officers’ commitment to duty, stating, “We did not strike. We reported for work every day and performed our responsibilities daily.” He highlighted concerns over ticket quotas, declaring them illegal under New York law, alongside the potential for workplace retaliation.
Weather Challenges and Increased Call Volume
During the severe winter weather conditions from late January to early February, the town ran low on road salt and experienced a rise in police calls. Officers also endured 16 hours of mandatory training on new firearms, all this amid staffing shortages after the departure of seven officers at the start of the year. The scenario raises significant questions about the operations and management of the police department.
Persistent Decrease in Ticket Issuance
The latest records from the Tonawanda Police indicate that a mere 123 tickets were issued, a startling contrast to the number issued between 2021 and 2023, which spanned from 439 to 653 tickets over a similar timeframe. Town leadership claims the drop in ticket issuance results from alleged unauthorized striking by the officers, which they argue violates civil service laws across the state.
Mike O’Meara, president of the Police Conference of New York, the state’s largest police union, described the town’s actions as “unprecedented,” critiquing the fines and the labor complaint against the officers. Legal experts, however, underscore the complexities surrounding the union’s fate as evidence emerges.
Jerry Cutler, an author specializing in labor law, acknowledged the unusual contention that reduced ticket volume signifies a strike, noting that demonstrating a pattern of deliberate underperformance could lead to potential claims of an unlawful strike under New York law.
The Alleged Catalyst Behind the Conflict
The ongoing dispute traces back to disciplinary actions taken against Tonawanda Officer Bikramjit Singh. Singh, a U.S. Army veteran, faced accusations of improperly disposing of evidence during an investigation into a drug-related incident. He reportedly opened a bottle of water containing a suspicious bag and discarded its contents, believing them to be garbage, which later turned out to possibly contain drugs.
In a turn of events, Singh resigned amidst looming potential termination, which could have jeopardized his law enforcement certification. This incident further exacerbated tensions between rank-and-file officers and Chief Stauffiger, leading to allegations that Stauffiger is undermining his officers.
Political Overtones and Public Backlash
The atmosphere within the department is fraught with accusations of unfair treatment, especially against Stauffiger, who has been in the chief position for five years, taking charge during an initiative to eliminate corruption in the department. Thompson, who has led the union for just over a year, expressed discontent over a lack of due process and ongoing harassment claims.
The union has mobilized a public campaign urging residents to take action against local leadership, particularly targeting Stauffiger for purported retaliation and inadequate support for officers, including failure to provide essential gear during harsh winter conditions.
The Community’s Perspective
As the controversy intensifies, union representatives assert that the ultimate victims of this dispute are the residents of Tonawanda. O’Meara remarked, “Make sure you highlight the impact on town residents, who rely on their police for safety and support during crises.” As this dynamic unfolds, the potential for the case to set significant legal precedents looms large on both sides of the dispute.
A Potential Turning Point for Police Union Rights
Thompson posits that the legal implications of these fines could pave the way for new interpretations of labor laws concerning police officers. He anticipates that this unprecedented use of civil service law against the police could form vital case law in future labor relations, indicating that much remains at stake as the situation evolves.
In summary, this incident encapsulates both the complexities of labor relations and the critical importance of community trust in law enforcement agencies. As the narrative progresses, stakeholders from both sides will closely monitor developments, eager to see how local governance, law enforcement, and community interests intersect in this highly charged environment.
