Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Podcaster Joe Rogan has openly criticized California Governor Gavin Newsom, characterizing him as the Democratic Party’s flawed attempt to create a direct competitor to his successful show. This commentary comes amid rising discussions about the significance of podcasts in shaping political narratives ahead of the 2024 election.
Dubbed by many as the “podcast election,” the upcoming vote may significantly hinge on the influence of popular podcasters like Rogan. It is argued that shows featuring figures such as Donald Trump have swayed public opinion, particularly among young male voters. In this context, Democrats are feeling the pressure to establish their own podcasting stronghold.
In a lighthearted exchange with fitness expert Jillian Michaels, Rogan referred to Newsom as his “favorite podcaster.” He jokingly remarked about Newsom’s podcast titled “This is Gavin Newsom,” initially believing it had been canceled due to widespread ridicule.
Rogan suggested that Newsom’s efforts to reach out to conservative voices like Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon did not pan out well for him. “He had this idea of reaching across the aisle, and then he gets guys like Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon on, and they eat his lunch,” Rogan commented. He speculated that Democratic leaders might have been bewildered, thinking, “What the f— are you doing? You’re making us look horrible.” This moment highlights the risk involved when political figures attempt to engage with adversarial audiences.
After noticing that Newsom had uploaded additional episodes, Rogan revised his critique, suggesting that these new segments might cater to more liberal or anti-Trump guests. He quipped, “Oh, Rahm Emanuel. Okay, now he’s with his own side. Scott Galloway, pretty much his own side. Anthony Scaramucci. He hates Trump, that’s a good move. Ezra Klein, okay, that makes sense,” pointing to a clear alignment in guest selection.
Despite these new episodes, Rogan maintained that the podcast’s visibility is lacking. “It’s just that it’s so horrible, nobody’s watching it, and nobody’s even talking about it anymore,” he observed. This statement raises questions about the effectiveness of political figures utilizing podcasts as a communication tool.
Rogan’s remarks illustrate his belief that Newsom’s podcast serves as a case study of the Democratic Party’s scramble to replicate the success of platforms like “The Joe Rogan Experience.” He noted, “It was so funny because that was the response after the election. They said, ‘Well, podcasts influenced the election, so we’ll start our own podcast.’ Your podcast is gonna make people even more inclined to not vote for you.” This sentiment captures the ironic struggle that Democrats face in the ever-evolving media landscape.
During the discussion, Michaels reminisced about Democrats expressing the need for their own Rogan-like figure, while noting that they used to have one in Rogan himself. “Joe was on your side,” she stated, pointing to the political shifts that have occurred within the left-leaning community. This historical reflection opens a conversation about how the American left has altered its composition over recent years.
In response, Rogan suggested these shifts might have created a more insular environment. He remarked, “That’s because it’s a cult,” emphasizing the divide between those advocating for essential social services and those pushing for more controversial issues. His comments reveal a broader conversation about values and priorities within the Democratic Party.
The ongoing dialogue regarding Rogan and Newsom illuminates the intricate relationship between politics and media. As more politicians embrace podcasting as a tool for engagement, the potential impact on voter sentiment cannot be understated. Podcasts offer an intimate space that allows politicians to connect with audiences in unprecedented ways.
As the 2024 elections draw closer, the stakes continue to rise for both parties. While Democrats strive to carve out a niche in the podcasting arena, it remains to be seen whether they can achieve meaningful connections with voters. Rogan’s commentary serves as a reminder of the challenges they face in establishing an authentic voice amid a rapidly changing media environment.
Ultimately, the endeavor to replicate the podcasting success of figures like Joe Rogan remains fraught with complications. The conversation sparked by Rogan and Newsom underscores the importance of adapting strategies that resonate with a diverse electorate. As political narratives evolve, the role of podcasts in shaping public discourse will likely remain a topic of both interest and scrutiny.