Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A convicted felon, designated a “criminal alien” and a suspected terrorist, has been apprehended by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials following his release from Arapahoe County Jail in Centennial, Colorado. Homaidan Al-Turki, who served 19 years for serious crimes including sexual assault, will be deported back to Saudi Arabia.
In 2006, Al-Turki faced a jury trial that resulted in multiple convictions, including misdemeanor false imprisonment, conspiracy to commit false imprisonment, 11 counts of felony unlawful sexual contact, extortion, and theft exceeding $15,000. His lengthy sentence was served at the Colorado Department of Corrections, where he was housed until his recent release.
Initially eligible for parole in 2011, Al-Turki’s release was indefinitely delayed due to his non-participation in the state’s sex offender treatment program. While incarcerated, he filed numerous legal motions, claiming ineffective assistance from his defense attorney during his trial.
During legal proceedings, District Court Judge Eric White expressed concern over the representation provided to Al-Turki, noting that his counsel may have misinterpreted crucial jury instructions. These instructions indicated that misdemeanor unlawful sexual contact could be escalated to a felony if based on coercive actions.
Al-Turki’s original defense team believed that the unlawful sexual contact charges were misdemeanors, which typically result in a maximum jail sentence of two years. However, the jury’s findings of physical force prompted enhancements to class 4 felony charges, leading to severe penalties including a six-years-to-life sentence.
The 18th Judicial District Attorney’s Office responded to Al-Turki’s circumstances by consenting to amend some felony counts on the condition that he would be sent back to Saudi Arabia. Now aged 56, Al-Turki pleaded guilty and received concurrent sentences as part of his adjudication.
The terms were concurrent across all counts, including a mandatory period of supervised parole. Given his near two-decade imprisonment, Al-Turki had already served this requirement.
On Tuesday afternoon, immigration officials took Al-Turki into custody based on a removal order that mandates his deportation to his native country. The Assistant District Attorney, Ryan Brackley, acknowledged the complexity of the decision, arguing that it balanced the need for public safety and the efficient use of judicial resources.
Brackley stated that the outcome would ensure Al-Turki remains recognized as a convicted felon while facilitating his removal from the community. The case has garnered attention due to its implications concerning illegal immigration and the complexities of the U.S. court system.
ICE officials revealed that Al-Turki initially entered the U.S. in 1992, only to escape in 1993. He legally reentered in 1994 and was questioned following the infamous 9/11 attacks, leading to another exit before reentering lawfully in 2002. His criminal convictions solidified an administrative order of removal since 2013.
In a statement shared on X, an official confirmed that Al-Turki “won’t be welcome back to the United States again.” This assertion underscores the government’s stance on individuals with severe criminal histories and their right to remain in the country.
This case has sparked discussions regarding state and federal immigration policies, particularly how they align with maintaining community safety. As communities contend with crime and immigration, the necessity to prioritize public safety has become increasingly evident.
Furthermore, Al-Turki’s situation reflects broader concerns over the responsibilities of the judicial system in effectively addressing cases involving foreign nationals convicted of serious crimes. Observers continue to debate potential reforms to ensure a balance between upholding justice and protecting public interests.
The resolution of Al-Turki’s case serves as a reminder of the challenges posed by complex immigration laws intersecting with the criminal justice system. As authorities navigate these waters, the implications extend beyond individual cases, highlighting the urgent need for comprehensive policy reviews and community dialogues regarding crime, punishment, and immigration.