Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The recent widespread blackouts in Spain and Portugal stirred global anxiety over potential vulnerabilities in national power grids, leading to speculation about the possibility of an electromagnetic pulse attack. Although officials ruled out an EMP, this incident sparked renewed concern over the preparedness of the United States against large-scale disruptions and the exacerbating threats of modern technology.
Experts, including Bryson Bort, a cybersecurity authority and former member of the Army Cyber Institute board, highlight that the U.S. remains alarmingly susceptible to various threats. Among these are not only EMPs but also increasingly advanced cyber and artificial intelligence attacks. Bort noted, ‘There are a lot of other problems that present a higher probability. While EMPs are a concern, they distract from the more immediate threats.’
An EMP is a burst of electromagnetic energy that can disrupt electronic devices over large areas, with origins that can be either natural, such as solar flares, or artificial, initiated by a high-altitude nuclear detonation. Unlike cyberattacks that primarily impact software, an EMP can incapacitate physical infrastructure, potentially reverting society to pre-electric conditions with disastrous effects.
James Woolsey, former CIA Director, has labeled EMPs as one of the most significant vulnerabilities facing the nation. Estimates suggest that in the event of a substantial EMP incident, up to 90% of the American population could face death within a year due to the collapse of critical infrastructure. Dr. William Forstchen, an expert on EMP threats, emphasized the immediate consequences of losing essential services, pointing out that, ‘The very first thing you’ve got to lose is your water supply.’ He cautioned that within days, vital services such as nursing homes, hospitals, and law enforcement would be severely crippled.
Amid increased awareness, the Trump administration previously issued an executive order aimed at enhancing federal preparedness for such devastating events. Yet, Bort expressed skepticism regarding the effective implementation of these measures, asserting, ‘We are not prepared for this at all.’ He underscored a significant gap in readiness across various sectors, suggesting a need for urgent attention in fortifying national defenses.
Dr. Forstchen conveyed cautious optimism about the proposed ‘Golden Dome’ project, a dual ground and space-based initiative designed to intercept EMP threats. However, he noted that significant advancements are still years away, raising concerns about the immediate risks associated with outdated infrastructure.
While the potential impact of EMP attacks is alarming, experts emphasize that cyber threats present a more immediate risk to critical infrastructure. Bort pointed out that Chinese cyber espionage has infiltrated American civilian infrastructure since 2010, with no major incidents reported thus far. Nevertheless, the ongoing presence of foreign adversaries lodged within these systems heightens risk significantly. Bort affirmed, ‘They haven’t done anything yet, but they are absolutely in there and setting up to do something at some point.’
The situation was exacerbated this week when reports emerged indicating that U.S. officials discovered communication modules embedded in Chinese-made power inverters, devices that connect renewable energy sources such as solar and wind to the electric grid. Bort highlighted a military-civilian coordination simulation, ‘Jack Voltaic,’ which revealed a concerning interdependence on critical infrastructure. He elaborated, ‘You can’t even have an electric grid if you don’t have water because you can’t cool it.’
Cyberattacks often result from extensive reconnaissance. Hackers may infiltrate systems and lay dormant for months or years, awaiting a politically opportune moment to strike. Bort clarified, ‘A cyberattack is not something where Putin says, ‘Hey, hit Detroit tomorrow.’ It’s already set in place. When the political situation calls for it, that’s when the trigger gets pulled.’
The emergence of artificial intelligence, particularly the pursuit of artificial general intelligence (AGI), introduces another, less understood risk to the nation’s infrastructure. Tyler Saltzman, a military technologist, warned that malicious utilization of AI could dismantle the power grid entirely. He described the current state of America’s infrastructure as ‘very fragile,’ positing that any disruption in the power supply could lead to societal chaos.
Saltzman expressed grave concern about the implications of AGI surpassing human control. He elaborated, ‘Once AGI comes online, it could easily take down our power grid, infiltrate our financial systems, destroy our economy. If it observes how violent humans are to one another, why would it choose to aid us?’
The recent incident involving a Chinese surveillance balloon drifting over U.S. territory for several days before being shot down drew significant attention. While defense officials suggested its primary purpose was espionage, they noted the potential for high-altitude balloons to be employed in electronic warfare, including for deploying EMPs. This has led to debates about the effectiveness of missile-based delivery systems, which may provide more reliable means of attack.
As discussions about offensive and defensive measures evolve, experts maintain that whether the next significant threat emerges from the sky or from cyber infiltrations, the consensus remains clear: the U.S. is insufficiently prepared. Bort remarked, ‘We’re still thinking about wars with tanks, while the real fight is already happening inside our infrastructure.’
To safeguard the nation from these evolving threats, comprehensive strategies must be implemented promptly. Policymakers and infrastructure leaders require heightened awareness of vulnerabilities and robust investment in protective measures. Only through proactive engagement can America enhance its readiness to counter emerging risks posed by EMPs, cyberattacks, and the disruptive potential of artificial intelligence.