Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A prominent CNN anchor has co-authored a significant new book addressing President Joe Biden’s perceived mental decline during his time in office. The book, titled “Original Sin,” reveals the extent of a cover-up allegedly orchestrated by Biden’s team to mitigate concerns about his cognitive fitness. However, many figures within CNN have previously criticized narratives suggesting that the President’s mental capabilities were declining.
As Jake Tapper and co-author Alex Thompson work to promote this compelling account, media analysts have observed that CNN and various mainstream outlets largely downplayed or even ridiculed the idea that Biden could be losing mental acuity prior to the debate with former President Donald Trump last year.
Here are four notable instances from CNN’s past coverage regarding this issue.
Recent discussions surrounding Biden’s cognitive abilities gained traction following the release of the book, which features insights from high-level Democratic sources worried about his age. Notably, videos of Biden appearing disoriented or freezing during public events circulated widely in early 2024, prompting a strong response from the White House. Officials claimed that many of these videos were misleading or edited to misrepresent reality.
The term “cheap fakes” became prevalent, particularly after Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre reiterated on multiple occasions that fact-checkers compromised the integrity of these claims.
CNN’s White House correspondent Arlette Saenz echoed the administration’s narrative concerning a widely shared video capturing Biden’s momentary freeze during a fundraiser with Jimmy Kimmel. She suggested that the President simply paused to survey the audience before exiting the stage alongside former President Barack Obama. However, she also attributed right-wing media outlets’ reactions to an unfair framing of Biden’s behavior.
During a subsequent panel discussion, CNN commentator and ex-Kamala Harris adviser Jamal Simmons labeled Biden’s viral moment as an “obviously selected video” aimed at painting the President in a negative light. Simmons stated, “These are cheap fakes, as the White House and Biden people are calling them,” reiterating the administration’s insistence that context was crucial.
Contrarily, Tapper has recently expressed more critical views regarding the Biden administration’s approach. He stated, “The Biden White House falsely claimed that the video clips showing Biden in unusual situations were ‘cheap fakes.’ This narrative persisted anytime video surfaced indicating Biden was acting atypically or appeared out of touch. These were not fabricated; they were authentic recordings.”
In the aftermath of the Robert Hur report, where Biden received a characteristically unflattering description outlining concerns about his memory, CNN published an article exploring broader issues related to cognitive ability in public figures over the age of 80. The article also sourced comments from professionals cautioning against hastily labeling Biden’s occasional word-recall troubles as signs of severe cognitive decline.
The article further included perspectives on how societal ageism significantly influences public perception. A noted professor explained that skepticism surrounding Biden can often stem from biases against the elderly, stating, “Ageism is not just a societal issue; it also entails personal mindsets that can negatively affect health outcomes.”
Former CNN media reporter Oliver Darcy has strongly criticized narratives positing that Biden suffers from significant cognitive impairment in his prior newsletters. He previously commented that the so-called “MAGA Media” has perpetuated a portrayal of Biden as mentally impaired.
In his writings, Darcy anticipated that Biden would possess ample opportunity to dispel these narratives during the debates. However, he noted that the expectations set by the Republican side could be detrimental to their case against Biden.
Darcy also called for higher accountability from media outlets, labeling certain reports as insufficient and urging them to deliver a clearer message to the public regarding Biden’s condition. He emphasized the responsibility of the press to challenge misleading narratives actively.
Even when Biden withdrew from the 2024 presidential race last July, commentators like Ana Navarro continued to advocate for his mental competence. In a heated exchange about his fitness to serve, Navarro resisted speculation, stating she had witnessed his energy and engagement at various functions.
Navarro’s fervent defense seemed to stem from a mix of personal conviction and partisanship. Despite her Republican affiliation, she actively celebrated Biden, having even hosted events during the Democratic National Convention.
Following the release of Tapper’s new book, CNN has maintained its confidence in his prior reporting, highlighting how he diligently investigated the implications of Biden’s mental fitness. Tapper himself, however, has expressed feelings of “humility” regarding his earlier coverage, acknowledging the role conservative media has played in shedding light on unaided observations.
This ongoing discussion emphasizes the complexity of media narratives surrounding political figures and the difficulties in maintaining credibility amidst polarized environments.
As the discourse around Biden’s cognitive capabilities continues to evolve, both the media and political analysts must tread carefully. The intersection of aging, politics, and media portrayal will remain a potent theme in the upcoming months, challenging perceptions and potentially reshaping public opinion.
Thoughtful examination of these dynamics will likely play a crucial role in informing the electorate as they navigate the increasingly complex landscape of American politics.
Reported by Fox News Digital’s Joseph A. Wulfsohn, with additional insights.