Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A New Jersey municipality has initiated legal proceedings to acquire a 10-acre church property, aiming to convert it into recreational facilities featuring pickleball courts and soccer fields.
At the heart of this contentious issue is Christ Episcopal Church in Toms River, New Jersey. The church recently sought to broaden its outreach to the area’s homeless population by proposing a 17-bed overnight shelter, which has sparked a significant backlash from local residents.
Harvey York, the church’s attorney, emphasized the swift rise in community concerns following the shelter proposal. He remarked that the situation has rapidly intensified, leading to greater scrutiny from neighbors.
On April 30, Toms River Township Council announced its plan to place an ordinance on its agenda to condemn the church’s 10-acre site, which encompasses essential facilities like the parish house, auditorium, school, sanctuary, and deacon’s residence, using its eminent domain powers.
The township’s goal is to establish a recreational area on the church’s property, but York argues that this characterization does not align with the true intentions behind the township’s actions.
“Any governmental entity can condemn property for public use, but the township never considered this a suitable recreational site. Their claims of needing more recreational land contradict established facts and the community’s master plan,” York stated.
The church’s legal team insists that this move is a direct consequence of the church’s efforts to assist the homeless. According to York, the timing of the township’s plans indicates a retaliatory motive against the church for seeking to provide essential services to those in need.
“It is evident that the township’s actions are rooted in retaliation due to the church’s proposal for the homeless shelter,” he mentioned, highlighting constitutional protections for freedom of religion and referencing the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act. This act safeguards religious institutions from discriminatory practices in zoning and land use decisions.
York expressed skepticism about the legality of the township’s actions, stating, “I don’t believe you will find a legal expert willing to support their claim that they have the right to proceed with this condemnation and expect to succeed.”
Community reactions remain polarized. Growing support has emerged for the church from local congregants and numerous amicus briefs from organizations nationwide, yet some residents endorse the township’s initiative. York indicated that while some are pleased with the mayor’s decision to condemn the property, there is a prevailing sentiment of shock and disapproval among many locals.
As the situation evolves, legal action appears imminent. “The diocese will determine the next steps, but litigation is a certainty. We believe that a legal challenge will be successful,” stated York.
He also asserted that the government should refrain from interfering in the church’s participation in community welfare, suggesting that such engagement is a vital aspect of the church’s mission.
To date, there have been five or six hearings regarding this matter, with the next zoning board meeting scheduled for May 22. Fox News Digital has sought comments from Toms River Township concerning the ongoing litigation and upcoming hearings.
Initially, in July 2023, the church sought approval to function as an outreach center for homeless individuals, which garnered the necessary approvals. York confirmed that the shelter application aligns with both local and state regulations and is designed to meet community needs effectively.
Legal Implications and Community Engagement
As this legal battle unfolds, the implications for both the church and the township are significant. The church’s initiative to create a homeless shelter has raised questions about religious freedom and governmental oversight in community matters. How local authorities approach this situation may set a precedent for similar cases in the future.
Future Developments
Observers will be closely monitoring the hearings and any subsequent decisions made by Toms River Township officials. This case may not only impact the future of the church property but also influence community dynamics as residents grapple with differing perspectives on religious outreach, property use, and recreational space.
In what can only be described as an ongoing struggle between community interests and religious rights, the outcome of this dispute will resonate far beyond the borders of Toms River. Many anticipate that the ramifications will echo in discussions on zoning laws, eminent domain practices, and the role of faith-based organizations within the public sphere.
