Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
FIRST ON FOX – Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, has formally requested that the Justice Department investigate TuSimple Holdings, a Chinese-owned self-driving trucking company, which ranks among the largest in the United States. This call to action comes in light of serious allegations that TuSimple has shared proprietary data and sensitive technology with entities linked to the Chinese government.
In a letter addressed to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and shared exclusively with Fox News Digital, Hawley urges the Justice Department to initiate a thorough investigation into TuSimple. He emphasizes that recent reporting has revealed disturbing practices involving the systematic sharing of crucial technological information with entities tied to the Chinese state.
According to Hawley’s letter, a recent report by the Wall Street Journal alleges that TuSimple has been actively transmitting proprietary data, source code, and autonomous driving technologies to Chinese state-affiliated organizations. This, he argues, demonstrates a blatant disregard for the national security agreement established in 2022 with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS).
Hawley points out that communications from TuSimple’s personnel in China have suggested a request for the shipment of sensitive Nvidia AI chips. Additionally, the records indicate “deep and longstanding ties” with manufacturers affiliated with the Chinese military, raising alarming concerns about the company’s compliance with U.S. laws.
To date, Hawley notes, TuSimple has faced minimal consequences for its actions, continuing to share data with China even after entering into a national security agreement with the U.S. government two years ago. This lack of accountability not only raises questions about the enforcement of current regulations but also about the broader implications for American technological leadership.
Hawley states, “If the reports about TuSimple are accurate, they represent not just a violation of export law, but a breach of national trust and a direct threat to American technological leadership.” Such statements underscore the seriousness of the claims being made.
The senator insists that the American public deserves clarity regarding how a company supposedly based in the U.S. became a conduit for transferring sensitive innovations to the Chinese Communist Party. Hawley’s remarks reflect growing concerns over the role of foreign influence within American businesses.
In his letter, Hawley outlines specific actions that he believes the Justice Department should undertake. Primarily, he urges an investigation into whether TuSimple has provided protected information to any Chinese entities, along with a review of activities that fell under the company’s national security agreement with CFIUS.
Furthermore, Hawley is concerned about another entity, Bot Auto. This Texas-based self-driving vehicle company employs many former TuSimple employees, and he has demanded to know what actions, if any, the Department of Justice has taken to ensure they are not engaging in similar risky behavior.
According to the Wall Street Journal, TuSimple’s data-sharing actions have contributed to shaping new regulations within the U.S. Commerce Department. These regulations now block the sale of internet-linked vehicles and parts tied to Chinese firms. A previous CFIUS inquiry concluded that TuSimple’s technology exchanges did not breach the national security agreement, though the company was fined for unrelated violations and ultimately paid a settlement of $6 million.
This latest development comes as Hawley, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Crime and Counterterrorism, continues to position himself as a prominent voice against the Chinese Communist Party’s influence in America. His vocal critiques, particularly regarding the conduct of U.S. firms in relation to intellectual property sharing, have drawn significant attention.
In calling for this investigation, Hawley aims to highlight not only the potential threats posed by foreign ownership but also the importance of safeguarding American technological advancements against unauthorized dissemination.
As the investigation unfolds, it raises pivotal questions about the integrity of U.S. technology companies and their responsibility in maintaining national security. The American public awaits clarity on how the Justice Department will respond to these serious allegations. The stakes extend beyond TuSimple, reflecting broader concerns about the influence of foreign entities in critical sectors of the economy.
Should the findings validate the claims made, the ramifications could extend to stricter regulations and oversight for companies engaging in interstate and international technology sharing. The commitment to protecting U.S. intellectual property must remain paramount as lawmakers and government agencies navigate these complex issues.