Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The House Republican Party is intensifying its efforts to persuade the Senate to adopt its version of President Donald Trump’s comprehensive bill, nicknamed the ‘one big, beautiful bill.’ This push comes even as Senate lawmakers indicate they intend to implement modifications.
As both chambers work to finalize a sweeping legislative package that encompasses tax reforms, immigration policies, and energy initiatives through the budget reconciliation process, underlying tensions between the House and Senate Republicans are becoming more apparent.
On Monday, the House Budget Committee conducted a staff-level briefing, according to two sources familiar with the meeting. This occurred on the same day the Senate resumed its sessions following the Memorial Day recess, prepared to deliberate over the expansive bill.
Members of the Senate Republican caucus have expressed their commitment to revising the House’s proposal in varying degrees. Some aim to implement even more stringent spending cuts, while others are focused on reducing potential impacts on Medicaid and green energy subsidies.
House GOP aides conveyed that the briefing served as a proactive approach to pre-emptively counter criticisms that Senate Republicans may raise regarding specific components of the legislation.
Documentation obtained by Fox News Digital, which was presented to House Republican aides, outlines targeted talking points addressing issues such as taxpayer savings, Medicaid stipulations, and planned rollbacks of green energy subsidies, among other critical topics.
This document also challenges the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office’s estimate indicating that the bill would increase the deficit by over $2 trillion within a decade.
It asserts that the overall cost of the bill, projected at $4.12 trillion, is offset by anticipated savings of $4.29 trillion attributed to mandatory spending reforms and economic growth. The bill forecasts a 2.6 percent economic growth rate over 10 years, a projection that stands in stark contrast to the CBO’s notably low estimate of 1.8 percent.
Amid these discussions, House Republicans are rallying support, emphasizing the importance of effectively communicating why their bill stands superior to the Senate’s version. One House GOP aide remarked that the team is determined to ensure history does not repeat itself as they navigate the legislative process.
Furthermore, senior House aides have urged Senate members to heed President Trump’s directives to expedite the bill’s delivery to his desk before the July 4 holiday.
The House successfully passed its version of the legislation during a lengthy all-night session filled with robust debate and procedural maneuvers aimed at delaying the vote from Democratic representatives.
This extensive bill seeks to make permanent the tax cuts introduced in Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, while also adding new tax breaks for senior citizens and removing taxes applied to tipped and overtime wages.
Additionally, the legislation allocates new funding to enhance border security and support Immigration and Customs Enforcement measures, as it retracts a significant portion of the green energy subsidies established through the Biden administration’s Inflation Reduction Act.
In an attempt to reduce expenditures and address perceived abuses within government safety net programs, the proposed legislation introduces work requirements for certain able-bodied Medicaid recipients starting in December 2026.
Moreover, the bill penalizes states that include illegal immigrants within their Medicaid expansions under the Affordable Care Act while providing incentives to states that do not.
The proposed reforms concerning both the Inflation Reduction Act subsidies and Medicaid present significant challenges for the Senate GOP, which currently holds a fragile three-seat majority.
The messaging document obtained highlights specific concerns of certain senators, including reassurances that rural hospitals will not face jeopardy due to the bill’s provisions.
The document notes that the proposed legislation will reinvest funds directed toward reopening rural emergency hospitals and ensuring accessible, cost-effective healthcare.
In relation to the rescinded IRA funds, it clarifies intentions to target unused or redundant allocations from initiatives like Neighborhood Access and Equity Grants and sustainable jet fuel projects, which the document suggests align more with ideological objectives than with infrastructure necessities.
Additionally, the discussion surrounding electric vehicle credits includes provisions to impose user fees starting by the end of fiscal year 2026, noting that due to their increased weight, EVs disproportionately contribute to wear and tear on public infrastructure without paying fuel taxes.
However, it remains uncertain whether Senators expressing these concerns will sway in favor of House arguments at this stage.
On Tuesday, Senator Josh Hawley, a Republican from Missouri, articulated his worries by stating the legislation would adversely affect rural hospitals within his state.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune acknowledged ongoing discontent regarding certain elements of the bill, stressing the necessity for Republicans to unify around a plan that can successfully pass through the Senate.
Thune underscored that failing to pass a version of the legislation is not an option, and he expressed confidence that a path forward would be determined within the coming weeks.
Other senators have called for deeper budget cuts than those proposed by the House, expressing dissatisfaction with the current plan. Senator Ron Johnson, a Wisconsin Republican, articulated that the House’s approach barely scratches the surface of what is required to restore pre-pandemic spending levels.
In response to inquiries, the House Budget Committee directed comments to Chair Jodey Arrington of Texas, who emphasized the need to balance ambitions for entitlement reform and spending cuts. He remarked that while there is room for enhancement, achieving significant cuts must align with garnering sufficient votes to proceed.
So, as the House GOP circles the wagons amid differing perspectives on the comprehensive bill, the path ahead is fraught with negotiation, urgency, and the intricate balancing of priorities within the Republican Party.
