Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Rapper 50 Cent has vocalized his displeasure regarding a tax proposal put forth by New York City Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. This response emerged after the candidate mentioned the rapper in a podcast interview concerning his taxation strategy.
The reference to 50 Cent appeared during Mamdani’s interview on the June 11 episode of The Breakfast Club. The candidate attempted to rally support for his Democratic primary campaign by outlining his goals to implement higher corporate taxes and combat the financial impacts of former President Trump’s policies on the city.
In the interview, Mamdani emphasized the need for increased taxation on corporations, asserting that many of them generate substantial profits. He argued that this fiscal change is crucial for enhancing New York City’s infrastructure and overall well-being.
Mamdani stated, “We are addressing corporations that are earning millions, not just in revenue but in actual profits. Additionally, we plan to impose a flat two percent tax increase on the top one percent of earners in New York, specifically those making a million dollars or more each year.”
Following the podcast, 50 Cent, whose real name is Curtis James Jackson III, took to Instagram to criticize Mamdani’s approach. He expressed skepticism about the proposed tax plan.
In a candid post, 50 Cent wrote, “Where did he come from? Whose friend is this? I’m not feeling this plan. No. I will give him $258,750 and a first-class one-way ticket away from NYC. I’m telling Trump what he said too!” This firm rebuttal highlighted the rapper’s discontent with the candidate’s suggestions.
This latest exchange is not the first time 50 Cent has vocalized concerns regarding tax burdens in New York. In 2020, he endorsed Donald Trump after learning about then-candidate Joe Biden’s proposed tax policy, which would have resulted in a staggering tax rate of 58% statewide and 62% in New York City.
His commentary at the time indicated a strong reaction to the proposed tax structure, as he posted, “WHAT THE F–K! (VOTE For TRUMP) IM OUT. F–K NEW YORK The KNICKS never win anyway. I don’t care Trump doesn’t like black people 62% are you out of ya f–king mind.” He later retracted his endorsement but the sentiments reflect his concerns about taxation.
In his defense of the tax plan, Mamdani articulated that the changes would amount to roughly $20,000 annually for individuals affected by the proposal, describing this as a minor adjustment that could yield significant benefits for the broader community.
“I know if 50 Cent is listening, he’s not going to be happy about this. However, my intent is to clarify that this is about $20,000 a year. It’s a rounding error, and collectively, these changes would improve the quality of life for all New Yorkers, even those currently facing higher taxes.” Mamdani’s comments reflect an intention to address socioeconomic disparities, although reactions continue to vary.
The exchange has garnered significant media attention, with various outlets seeking comments from both 50 Cent and Mamdani’s campaign team. As public interest grows, many are watching to see how this interaction might influence upcoming elections and to what extent celebrity opinions impact political discourse.
The landscape for New York City’s elections remains highly competitive, especially as candidates formulate policies aimed at addressing economic challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Voters are increasingly focused on fiscal responsibility and social equity, with figures like Mamdani advocating for more progressive solutions.
As the mayoral race heats up, the dialogue surrounding taxation will likely dominate discussions. The focal point is not solely about celebrity endorsements or critiques but about the broader implications for residents and their financial futures.
The back-and-forth between 50 Cent and Mamdani highlights a critical issue at the heart of the current political climate—taxation. This interaction illustrates how celebrity figures can influence public perception and provoke discussions about policies that affect everyday lives.
Ultimately, as voters evaluate candidates and their proposals, it is essential to consider how their plans may shape the future economy of New York City. This scenario demonstrates the intersection of celebrity culture and politics, further fueling conversations that could lead to monumental changes in governance.