Flick International Aerial view of the construction site for the Alligator Alcatraz detention center near the Everglades, showcasing machinery amidst vibrant mangroves.

Environmental Groups File Lawsuit Against Construction of Controversial ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ Detention Center

Several environmental organizations filed a federal lawsuit on Friday, claiming that officials failed to assess the ecological effects of the ‘Alligator Alcatraz,’ an immigrant detention center located near the Everglades and Big Cypress National Preserve.

The lawsuit, submitted by Friends of the Everglades and the Center for Biological Diversity in the Southern District of Florida, seeks to halt construction at the federal site, which is being established at the reportedly uninhabited Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport.

Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin criticized the lawsuit, stating, “It’s a lazy lawsuit, and it ignores the fact that this land has already been developed for a decade.” This response highlights the tension between environmental concerns and government initiatives.

The 30-square-mile site is expected to house 5,000 ICE detainees, with alligators and pythons serving as a natural form of security.

The Trump administration confirmed the project’s approval earlier this week, with construction crews beginning their work the following Monday. As developments unfold, the implications of this project remain a point of contention.

Legal representatives argue that the installation of housing units, construction of sanitation and food service systems, lighting infrastructure, and diesel generators alongside the use of the runway for transporting detainees threaten the local environment. According to reports, the lawsuit highlights potential “clear” environmental harms associated with the construction.

Environmental groups and Native American activists protested outside the airport on Saturday, urging officials to safeguard their homeland from further pollution. Their calls underscored the importance of preserving this sensitive ecosystem.

In court documents, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants, in their haste to build the detention center, have unlawfully sidestepped mandatory environmental reviews. They emphasize that any direct and indirect impacts on wetlands, wildlife, air quality, and water quality—as well as possible alternatives to the construction—must be addressed under the National Environmental Policy Act prior to moving forward.

Lawyers also accused officials of infringing upon Miami-Dade County code. They noted that the Emergency Management department lacks the authority to construct and manage a correctional facility.

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, in an interview with Fox News’ “Fox & Friends” on Friday, stated that illegal immigrants could start arriving by Tuesday, asserting that there would be no permanent modifications. DeSantis reassured viewers, saying, “It’s all temporary. We’ll set it up, and we’ll break it down. This isn’t our first rodeo. The impact will be zero.” His remarks reflect a wider strategy regarding immigration enforcement under the current administration.

The center, which is expected to serve as a “force multiplier” in enforcing President Donald Trump’s immigration policies, carries an estimated operational cost of about $450 million annually, subsidized by Federal Emergency Management Agency reimbursements.

As the lawsuit seeking an injunction progresses through the judicial system, construction at the site continues, prompting concerns from various stakeholders. Reports indicate that work has not halted, even with legal challenges looming.

The lawsuit names several key players, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, Acting Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Todd Lyons, Florida Emergency Management Director Kevin Guthrie, and officials from Miami-Dade County.

Requests for comments from Florida Emergency Management and ICE have not garnered immediate replies, highlighting the ongoing tension between governmental transparency and public concern. Efforts to reach Miami-Dade County for a statement have also been unsuccessful.

As the legal battle unfolds, the broader implications for environmental policy, immigration enforcement, and community protections hang in the balance.

The Path Forward is Uncertain

This developing situation shines a spotlight on the conflict between infrastructure development for immigration enforcement and environmental preservation. The balance between federal actions and local ecological concerns may dictate future policies and legal actions.

As stakeholders await the court’s decision on the lawsuit, the conversation surrounding ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ will likely continue to evolve, involving broader discussions about the impact of such facilities on vulnerable ecosystems and local communities.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.