Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
California Governor Gavin Newsom announced he will determine the suitability for parole of Erik and Lyle Menendez, who were convicted for the 1989 murders of their parents, by Labor Day. The brothers inflicted fatal shotgun wounds to their parents in their Beverly Hills home, an act that has sparked extensive media interest and public debate.
As the Menendez brothers’ parole hearing approaches on August 21 and 22, Governor Newsom discussed the case in depth during a recent podcast with Ryan Murphy, the creator of ‘Monsters.’ This podcast episode, titled ‘This is Gavin Newsom,’ explored the complexities surrounding the Menendez case.
The governor holds the final authority regarding their parole and is expected to announce his decision shortly if the parole board recommends their release.
Murphy remarked, “That’s heavy stuff,” highlighting the weight of the decision that rests on the governor’s shoulders.
Newsom has stated that he intentionally refrained from watching the Netflix documentary series about the brothers to ensure that outside influences do not cloud his judgment.
He shared with Murphy, “I kept having a temptation to want to see it but recognized that this matter may land on my desk. I want to rely on the facts presented in the official files and not be swayed by media portrayals.”
The producer jokingly suggested that Newsom could finally watch the series on Labor Day, just after the parole board’s recommendation is expected by the end of August. “I’m going to see if I made the right decision,” the governor said playfully.
During a prior discussion between Newsom and Murphy before the series premiered, Murphy suggested that the documentary would ignite intense debate about the case.
Newsom reflected on Murphy’s comments, saying, “When you spoke with me, you implied an apology, and I underestimated how right you were to feel that way.”
Both the documentary ‘Monsters’ and the related documentary, ‘The Menendez Brothers,’ have played significant roles in rekindling public interest in the 1996 trial. This renewed visibility contributed to the recent resentencing hearing in Los Angeles Superior Court, where Judge Michael Jesic altered their life-without-parole sentences to reflect a 50-to-life term, allowing eligibility for parole consideration.
Following the ruling, Newsom elaborated on the intricate process of evaluating the brothers’ eligibility for parole during a news conference on May 14. He stated that a team of forensic psychologists had conducted comprehensive risk assessments for each brother before a decision could be reached.
“We thought this approach would be prudent,” he said, emphasizing that these assessments were scrutinized by various parties, including Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman and the victims’ family.
The discussions surrounding the brothers’ Comprehensive Risk Assessments have become contentious. The findings labeled them as “moderate risk,” a shift from their previous classification as “low risk.” This assessment change came amid reports of the brothers violating prison regulations, including contraband issues, particularly with the unauthorized possession of cellphones.
Hochman addressed the assessments, beginning with Lyle Menendez, whose behavior demonstrated deceit regarding the contraband phone. He indicated that Lyle exhibited an attitude of entitlement and a pattern of minimizing his rule violations.
Erik Menendez faced similar scrutiny, flagged for drug possession and involvement in aiding fellow inmates with tax fraud issues.
Hochman, who ran on a tough-on-crime platform, remains vocal about his belief that the brothers have not adequately rehabilitated during their time in prison.
In the recent podcast episode, Newsom reiterated that parole decisions rely on established criteria, including in-prison behavior and psychiatric evaluations.
During a previous lunch, Murphy revealed that he initially opposed the Menendez brothers’ parole. After engaging deeply with the material and the individuals behind the project, he found his views evolving.
“I genuinely believe they should be released,” Murphy remarked. “I was astonished to discover how my perspective shifted by the end of my involvement.”
Murphy noted he was particularly moved by the brothers’ decades of good behavior and the strong familial bonds they have maintained.
“If not now, when? What societal benefit is there in keeping them incarcerated when they might contribute positively to society? That question carries a powerful weight,” he stated.
Newsom acknowledged the moral complexity inherent in this case. He remarked, “Some have pointed out the message it sends if we allow individuals who have killed both parents to be released.”
He contrasted the Menendez brothers’ situation with that of others serving sentences without access to public advocacy or opportunities for rehabilitation. He pointed out that individuals convicted of even more severe offenses have sometimes been granted parole after serving less time.
Murphy empathized with the difficulty of this decision, stating, “It’s a very slippery slope, and it’s a really challenging road. I feel for your position.”
The tragic events of August 1989 saw Beverly Hills socialites José and Kitty Menendez shot dead in their home. Hochman previously characterized the murders as having a “mafia-like” quality due to the violence involved.
At the time of the killings, Erik and Lyle were 18 and 21 years of age, respectively. They were ultimately convicted in a highly publicized trial in 1996.
The defense argued that their actions stemmed from years of abuse suffered at the hands of their father. Despite a hung jury during the first trial, they were eventually found guilty in 1996. Public opinion remains divided on whether their actions were driven by self-defense or greed.
Fox News Digital has reached out for comments from Governor Newsom’s office regarding the ongoing developments in this case.
