Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

USA Fencing has revised its gender eligibility policy after facing months of scrutiny for permitting biological males to compete in women’s categories. This update marks a significant shift in the organization’s approach to gender inclusivity in the sport.
The new policy, announced last week, stipulates that only athletes identified as female at birth can compete in domestic women’s competitions, provided they meet all other entry criteria. This change takes effect next month and represents a clearer stance on gender participation in fencing.
Under the previous rules, athletes were required to register with USA Fencing according to the gender with which they identify. Furthermore, biological males could only compete in women’s events after undergoing a calendar year of testosterone suppression treatment. This approach sparked widespread debate about fairness and safety in women’s sports.
In April, USA Fencing signaled its intention to update its gender-eligibility policy to create a women’s category exclusively for athletes classified as female. However, the newly released official policy does not include that exclusive language, leading to confusion and concern about its implications.
Despite making these changes, USA Fencing has not clarified whether the new policy strictly prohibits all biological males from participating in women’s events. The organization has also refrained from detailing how it will enforce the updated policy. Questions remain regarding whether mandatory sex testing will be implemented or if modified birth certificates will be accepted as proof of an athlete’s sex at birth.
The revised policy follows public feedback and a statement from USA Fencing, which cited new guidelines from the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee, known as the USOPC. On July 18, 2025, USOPC released guidelines that all national governing bodies must adopt under a federal executive order issued earlier this year.
The upcoming changes aim to align USA Fencing with these new national standards while maintaining a commitment to respect, fairness, and athlete well-being.
In their statement, USA Fencing emphasized the importance of community support, stating, “This update aligns our sport with current national standards while keeping community support at the forefront.”
The discourse surrounding USA Fencing’s policies intensified following a viral incident involving women’s fencer Stephanie Turner. During a competition in Maryland, Turner kneeled in protest against a trans opponent, leading to her disqualification for refusing to compete. This act of defiance ignited a wave of backlash against USA Fencing and forced the organization into the national spotlight.
In response to the growing controversy, the federal government held a hearing on the matter on May 7. The Department of Government Efficiency Subcommittee convened to discuss concerns regarding fairness in women’s sports. Turner provided testimony during the hearing, criticizing USA Fencing’s policies while chair Damien Lehfeldt represented the organization.
Furthermore, USA Fencing faced intensified scrutiny for its prior policy, which gave preferential treatment to states with LGBTQ-friendly laws for hosting competitions and included provisions that may have limited the playing of the national anthem during events.
In early June, USA Fencing’s board of directors voted to amend the controversial policy. This led two board members, Andrey Geva and Abdel Salem, to file a lawsuit against the remaining board members, alleging misrepresentation during congressional testimony at the May hearing. Both plaintiffs have strong ties to the sport and organization, having previously coached or competed for Team USA.
USA Fencing acknowledged this ongoing litigation, stating, “We will vigorously defend the organization in court.” The organization aimed to clarify its commitment to transparency and integrity amid rising tensions and public scrutiny.
The changes in USA Fencing’s policy reflect broader national conversations about gender, fairness, and inclusion in sports. As organizations navigate these complex issues, they face significant pressures from various stakeholders, including athletes, advocates, and the public.
While the new transgender policy addresses immediate concerns, it raises critical questions about the future of gender inclusivity in competitive sports. The implications of these changes will likely reverberate beyond fencing, influencing other sports organizations as they formulate their own policies.
As of now, USA Fencing continues to define its path forward amid this evolving landscape. It remains committed to promoting the sport while ensuring fair competition and athlete safety.
Overall, the recent modifications to the policy underscore the challenges that sports entities face as they strive to find a balance between inclusion and fairness.