Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

The Minnesota division of USA Fencing has announced that it will only sanction mixed-gender events going forward. This decision follows the implementation of new policies which prohibit biologically male transgender athletes from competing in women’s competitions.
Last month, USA Fencing altered its policies to mandate that only biological females can compete in the women’s category. This shift aligns with recent updates from the U.S. Olympic and Paralympic Committee regarding athlete safety, influenced by President Donald Trump’s executive order focusing on inclusion in women’s sports.
In a move to counteract these changes, the Minnesota division has expressed a commitment to inclusion, openly condemning the new USA Fencing policies as detrimental to the sport.
The Minnesota USA Fencing division’s official statement emphasized their commitment to inclusivity. It stated, “The Minnesota Division would like to confirm our commitment to inclusion and acknowledge the harmful effects of the new USA Fencing policy as guided by the USOPC’s guidelines.” The announcement further noted that the changes have caused significant pain and confusion within the fencing community.
Furthermore, the division reiterated the necessity of adhering to the Minnesota Human Rights Act, which safeguards gender identity rights. This legal framework compels them to find a balanced path forward without violating either USA Fencing’s policies or state laws.
It proclaimed, “We are currently seeking guidance on how to move forward without violating either the USA Fencing policy or the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Due to this, only mixed events will be sanctioned at this time.” The division’s statement concluded with a strong message of support: “Trans and nonbinary fencers belong here, and we see you.”
The landscape of USA Fencing has been under intense scrutiny for several months, particularly surrounding its stance on transgender athletes. April brought significant attention when footage of fencer Stephanie Turner kneeling in protest of competing against a transgender opponent became viral. This incident led to her disqualification and backlash against USA Fencing, further igniting conversations about gender eligibility in sports.
Following this widely publicized event, a federal hearing took place on May 7. This hearing, led by the Department of Government Efficiency, addressed the crucial issue of gender participation in sports. Turner testified against USA Fencing chair Damien Lehfeldt, shedding light on the concerns many athletes have about fairness and inclusive practices.
Early June witnessed the USA Fencing board of directors voting to revise its prior policies. These changes arose in response to various critiques following Turner’s viral protest. The previous policies had prioritized states with LGBTQ-friendly laws as competition venues and had also potentially restricted the playing of the national anthem at certain events.
Shortly after, two board members of USA Fencing filed lawsuits against their colleagues. They contended that allegations made by Lehfeldt during the May hearing misrepresented the organization. Plaintiffs Andrey Geva and Abdel Salem, both with longstanding ties to USA Fencing, emphasized the need for integrity in leadership.
In an official response to the lawsuit, USA Fencing stated, “This derivative lawsuit misrepresents our organization, and we will vigorously defend the organization in court; any attempt to disparage them will be addressed appropriately.” This tension among board members signifies a tumultuous period for the organization, highlighting internal divisions in how to address issues of gender and inclusion.
Simultaneously, Minnesota has emerged as a state resistant to federal directives regarding transgender athletes in sports. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, along with the Department of Education, has initiated Title IX investigations into Minnesota’s athlete policies. These investigations center on state laws allowing transgender girls to compete in women’s sports.
Notably, the Department of Education’s decision to escalate the investigation to federal levels occurred on June 12. Concurrently, Minnesota’s own legal battles continue, propelled by state Attorney General Keith Ellison who has filed against the Trump administration. Three anonymous female athletes have also lodged complaints against the state regarding competition with a transgender pitcher in the upcoming 2025 season.
The ongoing dynamics between state regulations and federal policies illustrate a rapidly evolving discourse surrounding gender and sports. Minnesota’s response through the USA Fencing division indicates a broader push for inclusivity amid rising concerns over federal intervention.
The sports community continues to grapple with the complexities of gender identity and participation. In this context, the Minnesota division’s decision to sanction only mixed events serves as a significant response to the national debate regarding transgender athlete policies.
As discussions around these issues remain heated, the role of governing bodies like USA Fencing will be pivotal in shaping future regulations and ensuring a fair and inclusive sporting environment.