Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
In recent years, California’s high-speed rail initiative has become a notorious example of government mismanagement and fiscal irresponsibility. The project, which has become a financial burden, continues to seek additional funding despite spending billions without delivering on its promises.
Last month, the federal government took a significant step by cutting $4 billion in funding from the high-speed rail initiative due to persistent delays and escalating costs. Instead of recognizing this as a setback, California officials celebrated by highlighting job creation and construction efforts.
Ten years ago, the math I presented indicated that for the cost of California’s high-speed rail, we could send every resident of the state on a roundtrip to Tokyo, purchase them a bullet train ticket to Kyoto, and provide accommodation at the Ritz-Carlton. Even then, there would still be money left for dining out at sushi restaurants.
A decade later, that promise of a bullet train is still just a fantasy, sustained by taxpayer funds and bureaucratic inertia.
High-Speed Rail Authority’s Response
Following the federal government’s funding cut, the California High-Speed Rail Authority responded with surprising enthusiasm, claiming credit for generating 15,500 jobs on what it still dubs America’s only high-speed rail project. The image depicted on social media featured a construction worker next to an American flag, attempting to cloak a failed infrastructure initiative in a veneer of patriotism.
However, this is merely a taxpayer-funded monument to mismanagement that continues to grow. The original commitment made to voters back in 2008 promised a 220 mph electric train connecting San Francisco to Los Angeles for a budgeted $33 billion. Today, the project’s cost has skyrocketed to an estimated $128 billion, while the completion timeline remains frustratingly elusive.
The Current State of the Project
Currently, the most tangible outcome of this ambitious venture is a limited rail segment connecting Merced and Bakersfield—two cities that were never envisioned as central to the project. In practical terms, it resembles building an airport shuttle linking an isolated cornfield to a rest stop. This absurdity raises the question: who will actually use this route?
Job Creation Justification
In recent discussions, the High-Speed Rail Authority has resorted to touting job creation as the principal justification for continuing the project. This rationale often emerges when there is a lack of transportation logic underpinning a major infrastructure project. However, as the economist Milton Friedman famously suggested, the mere creation of jobs does not justify a project; one could simply hand out spoons instead of shovels to achieve that same aim.
Cost Analysis of Alternatives
The financial analysis of this project continues to reveal staggering discrepancies. If we examine the cost of providing a unique experience for every Californian, it becomes clear that funding the high-speed rail is a less sensible choice.
- Providing a roundtrip flight to Tokyo for 39 million residents, costing $1,200 each, totals $46.8 billion.
- Adding a roundtrip bullet train ticket from Tokyo to Kyoto at $200 each sums up to $7.8 billion.
- Two nights at the Ritz-Carlton Kyoto at $1,400 per individual brings the total to approximately $54.6 billion.
In total, crafting these experiences for every Californian would amount to about $109 billion—significantly less than the current high-speed rail expenditures. This leaves an astonishing $19 billion difference between what could have been achieved versus what is essentially an overbudget train project.
The Reluctance to Halt the Project
Despite these alarming figures, the high-speed rail program trudges on with little opposition. Politicians in Sacramento appear reluctant to terminate the project, fearing political backlash. This includes Governor Gavin Newsom, who in 2019 publicly announced a pause on the rail project, only to quietly resume it three years later.
As it stands, Newsom may be positioning himself for a future political role beyond California. However, if he pursues national office, the implications of the high-speed rail project will be inescapable. This project, more than a mere transportation venture, risks becoming synonymous with his governance—an ambitious but flawed legacy, aptly titled The Newsom Line.
Time to Rethink Our Priorities
With such massive funding and commitment intertwined with inadequate planning and vision, it is crucial for both taxpayers and lawmakers to reassess the true value of the California high-speed rail initiative. At its current trajectory, it looks less like an operational transit line and more like a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of ambition without accountability.
As public understanding grows around the inefficiencies and financial implications of the project, the time has come for California officials to face the reality of their choices. Instead of doubling down on a flawed concept, they should seek alternatives that ensure accountable stewardship of taxpayer dollars. This way, they can truly serve the interests of the people, providing them with realistic and functional solutions rather than empty promises.
