Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
As tensions escalate between the federal government and local authorities in Chicago regarding the deportation of undocumented migrants, some residents are expressing strong support for stricter immigration policies. These sentiments align closely with the enforcement strategies advocated by President Donald Trump.
Vashon Tuncle, a local resident, recently voiced his frustrations during an appearance on The Ingraham Angle. He noted that many in his community feel overlooked by local and state leaders.
“The people of Chicago, we love Trump,” Tuncle declared. “The numbers spoke for themselves during the election … we actually wanted Trump to come here.” His comments reflect a growing sentiment among Chicagoans who believe their concerns are being sidelined by officials like Governor J.B. Pritzker and Mayor Brandon Johnson.
While Pritzker and Johnson have opposed federal deportation initiatives on the grounds of protecting human rights, Tuncle argues that they are neglecting their responsibility to safeguard the residents of Chicago. He insists, “Brandon Johnson has sworn an oath to protect the people of Chicago… They failed to do that because they’re continuously telling us they will protect illegal immigrants, knowing they’re bringing crime and drugs into our city.”
Immigration issues have become a significant flashpoint in Chicago. Tom Homan, the federal “border czar,” has signaled his determination to make the city a key target for immigration enforcement. His recent visit resulted in the deportation of an individual with a lengthy criminal history.
“He had a rap sheet of doing horrendous acts to children,” Tuncle lamented about the individual targeted. “Why is this guy leaving now in 2025?” This incident has intensified local discussions surrounding immigration policies.
Mayor Johnson has firmly opposed federal intervention and reaffirmed Chicago’s identity as a sanctuary city. “I’m standing with the full force of government today to demonstrate that Chicago is a welcoming city, regardless of who is in the White House,” he stated during a press conference last month. He emphasizes that Chicago’s local police will not act as federal agents, highlighting the separation of powers.
However, not all city officials agree with Johnson’s approach. Alderman Ray Lopez has openly criticized the mayor for prioritizing the interests of “hyper-liberal white progressives” over those of Black and Latino communities, as well as undocumented migrants.
“He’s not concerned about African-Americans, he’s not concerned about Latinos, and he’s absolutely not concerned about undocumented Mexicans who will bear the brunt of his actions,” Lopez asserted. He suggested that local law enforcement should be allowed to collaborate with ICE to detain migrants with criminal records, although this measure faced opposition in the city council.
Tuncle believes that Johnson’s policies do not resonate with many Chicago residents. “People in this city are sick of it,” he exclaimed. “They absolutely cannot stand the illegal immigrants. I mean, they’re bringing drugs and crime, and all sorts of heinous acts. People are just sick of it. They love people like Tom Homan because they’re cleaning up the city.” Since August 2022, over 50,000 migrants have arrived in Chicago, costing the city more than half a billion dollars in services.
Despite the polarized environment, Tuncle holds optimism regarding future immigration enforcement efforts in Chicago, especially following the confirmation of Pam Bondi as the new U.S. Attorney General. “I’m also excited about Pam Bondi being confirmed as Attorney General,” he shared. “It’s looking like Brandon Johnson is going to be behind bars pretty soon.”
The Department of Justice has escalated the situation by filing a federal lawsuit against the state of Illinois, the city of Chicago, Governor Pritzker, and Mayor Johnson. The lawsuit alleges breaches of federal immigration law, asserting that local laws intentionally obstruct federal enforcement efforts.
Bondi has also indicated a pause in federal funding for sanctuary cities such as Chicago. In a memo, she stated, “The Department of Justice will ensure that, consistent with law, ‘sanctuary jurisdictions’ do not receive access to Federal funds from the Department.” As the legal proceedings unfold, Chicago remains deeply divided on immigration, with a growing contingent of residents advocating for tougher enforcement even as local leaders strive to uphold the city’s sanctuary status.
As the debate continues, both sides seek to champion their vision for Chicago’s future. The challenge remains to find common ground in a city grappling with complex immigration issues.