Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Swarthmore College is facing a legal challenge from transgender track and field athlete Evelyn Parts, who claims the institution reinstated her to the women’s team after the NCAA altered its rules regarding transgender athletes. The lawsuit alleges that the college initially removed Parts from the women’s team in response to these changes but later added her back.
Parts filed this lawsuit this week, marking her as the third transgender athlete to pursue legal action against a U.S. college in recent weeks for being excluded from women’s teams. This growing trend reflects heightened tensions and debates surrounding inclusion in athletics.
In a statement provided to Fox News Digital regarding the lawsuit and its specific claims, Swarthmore emphasized its commitment to supporting the transgender community. The college’s response highlights its dedication to fostering an inclusive environment for all athletes.
Supporting the Community
Swarthmore stated, “We deeply value our transgender community members and the many ways they enrich campus life. We offer numerous resources to create a welcoming, supportive, and inclusive environment for transgender individuals. Recognizing the current climate, we understand this is a particularly challenging time for transgender community members, including student-athletes.”
The college continued, “We worked to support Evie Parts amid a time of rapidly evolving guidance while balancing the competitive opportunities for other members of the women’s track team in NCAA events. Given the pending litigation, we will refrain from commenting further.”
In her lawsuit, Parts alleges that she was informed in February that she could no longer participate on the women’s team. This was the same month the NCAA revised its gender eligibility policy after former President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled “Keeping Men Out of Women’s Sports.” Despite these changes, Parts asserts that she was “fully reinstated” to the women’s track team on April 11, resulting in her competing until her graduation in May.
She is recognized as the winner of the women’s 10,000 meters at the Bill Butler Invitational in April. Additionally, she participated in the Paul Donahue Invite and the Centennial Championships, showcasing her ongoing involvement in the sport.
Legal Context and Allegations
Parts’ attorney, Susie Cirilli, has voiced strong support for the lawsuit’s claims. In a statement, she remarked, “We stand by the allegations in the complaint. As stated, the NCAA is a private organization that issued a discriminatory policy. Swarthmore chose to adhere to that policy and, in doing so, disregarded federal and state laws.”
If the allegations prove accurate, Swarthmore would not be the first college to enable a biological male to compete in women’s sports after the NCAA rule change. For instance, Ithaca College admitted to allowing a transgender athlete to participate in a Division III rowing event in March, albeit in a non-qualifying heat.
The coaching staff at Ithaca described the athlete’s inclusion as a result of a “misunderstanding.” The NCAA subsequently issued a statement clarifying that the policy strictly prohibits males assigned at birth from competing on women’s teams, regardless of their identification status.
NCAA Regulations and Institutional Responses
The NCAA’s official statement underscored that breaches of this policy could result in a team being classified as mixed, disqualifying them from competing against women’s teams. Ithaca expressed its intent to comply with the policy while ensuring practice opportunities for athletes.
However, the NCAA did not disclose whether any repercussions would arise from Ithaca’s actions or if the results of the rowing event would be invalidated.
Previously, under the administration of former President Joe Biden, an executive order was in place safeguarding the rights of transgender athletes to compete in women’s sports. The NCAA’s former policy allowed participation of trans athletes, which contributed to previous legal battles involving institutions like the University of Pennsylvania and San Jose State University.
This ongoing legal struggle mirrors the experiences of trans athlete Sadie Schreiner. Cirilli also represents her in a lawsuit against Princeton University. Schreiner was previously permitted to compete for Rochester Institute of Technology’s women’s track and field team for two years before the recent changes in NCAA regulations.
Broader Implications and Future Developments
Concerns regarding transgender inclusion in women’s sports have provoked substantial discussions across various educational institutions. For instance, the Department of Education took action against multiple universities concerning incidents of trans inclusion before Trump’s executive order. They reached settlements with various institutions, including the University of Pennsylvania, which agreed to mitigate the impact of Lia Thomas’ participation on the women’s swimming team.
Discussions regarding similar resolutions with institutions such as Wagner College and ongoing investigations into San Jose State reveal a continuous effort to navigate these complex issues within collegiate athletics.
As Swarthmore College and other institutions face mounting scrutiny regarding their policies on transgender athletes, it remains to be seen how these legal battles will shape the future of college sports.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the NCAA regarding Parts’ lawsuit but has not yet received a comment on this growing situation.
Staying Informed
Stay updated on this evolving story as it develops in the coming weeks, as it represents a critical intersection of sports, law, and social issues.
