Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Former President Donald Trump is on a mission to reshape government institutions by eliminating what he describes as divisive messaging linked to the prior administration. Amid these efforts, the Smithsonian Institution has emerged as a key focus of scrutiny.
Earlier this year, in an executive order, Trump highlighted the perceived influence of a race-centered ideology at the Smithsonian. He aims to realign the museum’s exhibits with what he considers American values, discarding narratives that portray these values as oppressive.
As the nation prepares to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence in 2026, Trump has called for the Smithsonian to abandon its portrayal of American history that leans towards negativity. His administration seeks to combat the perception that American and Western ideals are inherently harmful.
The Smithsonian describes its mission as examining the history and legacy of race and racism, striving to promote social change through education and community engagement. This objective reflects a broader trend in which institutions are encouraged to tackle societal issues related to equity.
The mission of the Smithsonian encompasses much more than individual exhibits. The theme of racism permeates its 21 museums, libraries, and even the National Zoo. Many Americans might assume that the institution’s primary focus is showcasing the nation’s achievements in art and history. They may expect exhibitions that celebrate the courageous individuals who shaped the United States, fought against slavery, and played crucial roles during global conflicts.
However, this anticipated portrayal often contrasts sharply with the reality presented by many museums today. Instead of focusing on American exceptionalism and innovation, the Smithsonian appears to prioritize historical narratives steeped in race and reconciliation.
Aligned with his vision of celebrating American greatness, Trump’s White House recently informed Smithsonian Secretary Lonnie Bunch III of a planned review of museum exhibits. This initiative aims to ensure that content aligns with the President’s directive to restore confidence in cultural institutions and eliminate divisive or partisan narratives.
This inquiry has led to backlash from some historians and curators. Critics, such as Sarah Weicksel of the American Historical Association, have expressed concern that if historical content is manipulated, it could compromise the quality and integrity of American narratives taught to the public.
Critics of the current educational narratives often describe them as unflattering, arguing they emphasize racism and exploitation over patriotism and achievement. This perspective accuses academic institutions of instilling a sense of disdain among students rather than fostering pride in their country. While liberal biases within education have become a topic of debate, many historians maintain that a comprehensive understanding of history requires acknowledging complex and sometimes uncomfortable truths.
Figures such as Pulitzer Prize-winner Jon Meacham, who has had ties to key Democratic figures, articulate interpretations of U.S. history that some view as ideologically driven. Similarly, Doris Kearns Goodwin, another historian with a politically active background, has also faced criticism for her perspectives on leadership and governance.
Lonnie Bunch III, the Smithsonian’s first African-American director and a member of the Democratic Party, plays a critical role in shaping the institution’s vision. His leadership comes under scrutiny as he navigates the expectations of both conservative and liberal viewpoints regarding historical representation.
Bunch has acknowledged the tension surrounding Black history and its place within the broader context of American education. In his introduction to the exhibition “In Slavery’s Wake,” he remarked on the resistance from some political leaders towards discussions on race, which they often categorize as divisive.
The financial health of the Smithsonian is a pressing concern as taxpayer funding has surged to $1.09 billion, a significant increase from earlier years. However, despite the rise in budget, attendance figures have dwindled, with visitor numbers dropping from 40 million two decades ago to just 16.8 million recently. This decline raises questions about the effectiveness of current exhibitions in attracting diverse audiences.
Exhibitions at the National Museum of American History evoke varied reactions, often reflecting a modern sensibility that some interpret as political agenda. Items featured prominently in current collections range from a table used for drafting women’s rights declarations to tributes to immigrant contributions in health and journalism.
The Smithsonian’s ambitions have extended beyond U.S. borders, with programs that span the globe, including collaborations in Mexico, Oman, and various initiatives designed to foster science education. While some may view these efforts as essential diplomacy, taxpayers might question their alignment with national interests.
Critics argue that American history deserves to be presented in a way that emphasizes the nation’s achievements and merits, advocating for a re-evaluation of the Smithsonian’s current narrative framework.
As the Smithsonian looks toward the future, the challenge lies in balancing the presentation of historical truth with a sense of national pride. Under leadership that seeks to realign exhibitions with a vision of American exceptionalism, the institution has a critical opportunity to redefine its role in presenting history.
Redirecting focus onto highlighting America’s strengths and accomplishments could resonate more effectively with audiences. Emphasizing narratives that foster unity rather than division may ultimately allow the Smithsonian to fulfill its mission of educating the public while drawing visitors who celebrate the nation’s heritage.