Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

A clinical psychologist warns that severing ties with family over political disagreements, often touted as a form of self-care on social media, could lead to increased loneliness and deteriorating mental health.
Dr. Chloe Carmichael explains that isolating oneself from family and social support actually harms mental well-being. She likens this to choosing unhealthy junk food instead of nutritious options.
Carmichael, the author of the insightful book “Can I Say That? Why Free Speech Matters and How to Use It Fearlessly,” argues that distancing oneself from relatives over political views undermines essential family ties, resilience, emotional stability, and the freedom to express opposing opinions.
She observes a troubling trend among many progressive younger individuals opting to cut off connections with family members who support President Donald Trump. According to Carmichael, this disconnect is particularly noticeable with younger generations.
It is disheartening, she states, that younger family members frequently decide to sever relationships with older relatives, including their own parents. This trend reveals a growing divide that may ultimately be detrimental to family cohesion.
Carmichael connects this phenomenon to findings from research conducted at Tufts University, which reveals that individuals identifying as liberals tend to report poorer mental health compared to their conservative counterparts. She notes that liberals are also more inclined to engage in behaviors she labels as the “five Ds”: defriending on social media, distancing themselves, dropping relationships, disinviting speakers, and declining to date anyone with opposing political views.
“We face an epidemic of loneliness, and this trend of isolating oneself over politics aligns with this crisis,” Carmichael explains. She emphasizes the dangers posed by what she identifies as isolationist behaviors stemming from political discord.
Recent data from Gallup underscores the growing concern regarding Americans’ mental health over the past 24 years. Among young adults aged 18 to 29, the percentage stating they experience “excellent” mental health has dropped dramatically by 27 points in the last decade. This decline is particularly prominent among young women.
On many social media platforms, ending relationships with family members who hold opposing views is often framed as an act of empowerment. While Carmichael acknowledges that drawing clear boundaries can be vital in situations involving name-calling or physical threats, she cautions against defaulting to estrangement.
Dr. Carmichael advocates for the cultivation of resilience and the significance of maintaining relationships, even amidst differing opinions. She asserts that embracing a diversity of perspectives can enrich lives instead of impoverishing emotional experiences.
The ability to share one’s thoughts freely contributes to the establishment of more genuine relationships and robust social networks, serving as a protective barrier against mental health struggles. This openness also fosters a healthier mental environment.
“Studies show that naming our emotions can lessen activity in the amygdala, the part of our brain that reacts in fear,” Carmichael asserts. She stresses the importance of authentic communication as a remedy for alienation and oppression.
To help families manage political tensions, Carmichael emphasizes the concept of “listening resiliently.” She advises individuals to practice open-ended questioning while engaging with those who express triggering political viewpoints, refraining from immediate rebuttals.
Carmichael also suggests recalling personal experiences of shifting views as a means of cultivating empathy. Doing so allows family members to approach conversations with compassion, recognizing that everyone may go through their own transformative moments.
Individuals who find it challenging to communicate their thoughts can benefit from preparation and support. This may involve notifying a colleague beforehand about discussing a sensitive topic at work or practicing dialogues in advance. Familiarizing oneself with relevant speech policies can also provide clarity on rights during discussions.
Carmichael argues that fostering free speech and open dialogue contributes to improved mental health while diminishing bullying and polarization within society. She believes that open communication does not have to equate to the acceptance of hate speech.
“We do not have to choose between allowing free speech and letting bullying dominate our lives,” she stresses. “Providing individuals with effective communication tools leads to a decrease in issues like bullying, violence, and other serious societal problems.”
In combating misinformation, Carmichael believes that fostering open dialogue serves as a vital mechanism for scrutiny, examination, and debate. This approach, she asserts, ultimately leads to a more truthful understanding of issues.
Her new book arrives at a pivotal time as some liberal media figures advocate for shunning relatives who support Trump following the upcoming 2024 election. Just days post-election, a psychiatrist appearing on a prominent show suggested that distancing oneself from politically divergent family members during the holidays might be healthier.
The ongoing discourse raises important questions about family relationships in today’s polarized atmosphere. Striking a balance between personal well-being and familial connections remains a challenge for many.
Ultimately, understanding the emotional consequences tied to political divisions within families can pave the way for reconciliatory efforts and healthier communication dynamics in the face of differentiation.