Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

A transgender volleyball player has become a pivotal figure for a girls’ high school team in California, leading Jurupa Valley High School to an impressive undefeated record in league play. Despite this success, the team has encountered significant challenges as multiple opponents have chosen to forfeit.
As the season progresses, Jurupa Valley’s girls’ volleyball team currently holds a 6-0 record in league play, which places them firmly at the top of the River Valley League standings. Their latest victory against Rubidoux further solidified this position and improved their overall season record to 14-8.
Notably, eight of the team’s victories, including one of the six in league play, came as a result of forfeit decisions made by their opponents. While the teams that forfeited have not offered any specific reasons, suspicion lingers that these actions relate to the participation of transgender athlete AB Hernandez.
The most recent forfeiture came from Patriot High School, marking the first team within the same school district to withdraw from a scheduled match against Jurupa Valley. This series of forfeits has sparked conversations and debates regarding inclusivity and fairness in high school sports.
Jurupa Valley is slated to meet Patriot High School again on October 13, providing another opportunity to address the ongoing controversy surrounding transgender athletes.
In a striking development, two of Hernandez’s teammates have opted to leave the team in protest. They have filed a lawsuit against the Jurupa Unified School District (JUSD), citing their experiences playing alongside Hernandez over the last three years as the driving factor behind their decision.
With only five games left in the regular season, including the anticipated rematch with Patriot, Jurupa Valley seeks to maintain its competitive edge as postseason play approaches.
Last November, a similar situation unfolded when Stone Ridge Christian High School forfeited a semifinal playoff match against San Francisco Waldorf, a team that featured a transgender player. The forfeit was directly attributed to the presence of the trans athlete, highlighting persistent tensions within California’s high school sports landscape.
In their statement regarding the forfeit, Stone Ridge Christian expressed concerns about the implications of allowing a trans player on the opposing team. They emphasized their commitment to what they view as biblical truth, stating that they do not believe sex is changeable and that prioritizing the safety and health of their athletes is essential.
In light of these controversies, Governor Gavin Newsom’s office recently issued a statement addressing the challenges posed by transgender athletes in competitive sports. The statement clarified that decisions regarding the inclusion of trans athletes are not under the Governor’s direct authority, instead pointing to the roles of the California Department of Education (CDE) and the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF).
This statement also highlighted the legal framework in place. The CIF and CDE are currently facing a lawsuit from the U.S. Department of Justice over their ongoing policies that permit biological males to compete in girls’ sports. This legal battle underscores the significant divide in opinions regarding the participation of transgender athletes.
On April 1, the California state Legislature blocked two proposed bills aimed at reversing the existing regulations that allow transgender males to compete in girls’ sports. During the legislative discussions, Assembly member Rick Chavez Zbur controversially compared opposition to the current regulations to historical instances of persecution in Nazi Germany. This statement drew sharp criticism from colleagues and further fueled the contentious atmosphere surrounding the issue.
This comparison provoked strong reactions, with one Holocaust survivor’s descendant leaving the chamber in apparent distress over the remarks. Such incidents reflect the high stakes and emotional undertones surrounding discussions of gender identity and sports in California.
As Jurupa Valley navigates the complexities of maintaining performance while addressing these critical issues, the unfolding situation serves as a microcosm for broader discussions about inclusion, fairness, and the evolution of athletic policies. The team’s resilience in the face of protests and legal challenges speaks to the passionate beliefs held by many involved.
Looking ahead, the focus will remain on preserving competitive integrity while fostering an inclusive environment. The reactions from teams, opponents, and the community will undoubtedly shape the dialogue on transgender athletes in high school sports, making it a pivotal moment in California’s athletic history.