Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

FIRST ON FOX: The Department of Homeland Security has launched a scathing critique of a Democratic judge accused of taking activism to an unprecedented level. This criticism follows revelations that the judge allegedly harbored an illegal immigrant gang member, who recently pled guilty to serious criminal charges.
Cristhian Ortega-Lopez, a Venezuelan national, made headlines when federal authorities arrested him earlier this year. He illegally entered the United States in 2023 during the Biden administration. The arrest occurred in February at the residence of former Dona Ana County Magistrate Judge Jose Luis “Joel” Cano, 67, and his wife Nancy Ann Cano, 68.
Authorities have linked Ortega-Lopez to a notorious Venezuelan transnational crime syndicate known as Tren de Aragua. This group was designated a foreign terrorist organization under the Trump administration. Evidence such as tattoos, social media posts that featured firearms, and distinctive clothing all suggest Ortega-Lopez’s ties to this criminal network.
This month, Ortega-Lopez entered a guilty plea regarding his illegal firearm possession and conspiracy to destroy evidence. The implications of such actions reverberate through various levels of law enforcement and judicial accountability.
DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin issued a strong statement following the guilty plea. She emphasized that the actions of Judge Cano align with a broader trend of sanctuary politicians undermining U.S. law. Such individuals, according to McLaughlin, facilitate the continuation of criminal activities by shielding illegal immigrants from potential law enforcement actions.
McLaughlin remarked on the severity of the situation, stating that “time and time again, we see sanctuary politicians and activist judges like Jose Cano shield criminal illegal aliens—especially those suspected of gang affiliations—from arrest and removal from the country.” She characterized Judge Cano’s actions as taking judicial activism to a disturbing level, highlighting the dangers posed to public safety.
During her statement, she expressed concern that Ortega-Lopez, with his criminal affiliations, should never have been allowed to remain in the country. She asserted that this conduct is intolerable under the current administration, which prioritizes the safety of American citizens.
In further communication with Fox News Digital, a senior DHS official reaffirmed the agency’s resolve. They asserted that the ongoing discussions around a potential government shutdown would not hinder law enforcement from executing its mission to protect American citizens from dangerous illegal immigrants.
Federal agents tipped off about Ortega-Lopez’s residency at the Cano property in January. Authorities acted swiftly, executing a search warrant on February 28 that uncovered four firearms and three cellphones belonging to Ortega-Lopez.
During the search, Ortega-Lopez was permitted to make a phone call prior to his arrest. He claimed that the phone he needed to use was not one of the devices seized. Subsequent video calls from the Doña Ana County Detention Center revealed Nancy Cano using a black iPhone that prosecutors believe was Ortega’s missing phone.
In a significant development, Nancy Cano allegedly used her phone to facilitate communication between Ortega-Lopez and another individual named “Michelle” via WhatsApp. Evidence suggests that Nancy Cano played a critical role in attempting to cover up Ortega-Lopez’s criminal activities, even discussing plans to delete his social media accounts to erase incriminating evidence.
During a later search of the Cano residence, authorities sought Ortega-Lopez’s missing phone. In questioning, Judge Cano admitted to destroying the phone with a hammer due to concerns that it contained compromising material related to Ortega-Lopez’s gun-related activities.
The fallout from this investigation has been severe for Judge Cano and his wife. Both resigned from their positions following the revelations and now face significant legal repercussions. They were arrested on April 24 and subsequently released on $10,000 bail each. Both individuals are facing up to 15 years in prison for evidence tampering and conspiracy related to the case.
The case has sparked discussions about the responsibilities and consequences of judicial figures involved in protecting or harboring illegal immigrants. Observers are keenly aware of the legal and societal implications, particularly in a climate rife with debates surrounding immigration policies and law enforcement actions.
No comments have been received from the Canos’ attorney regarding these developments, leaving many questions unanswered as public scrutiny continues.
This situation raises critical questions about judicial accountability in America. As discussions surrounding immigration reform and law enforcement practices continue, this case serves as a significant example of the controversies that arise when legal authorities are perceived to undermine their own systems.
The ramifications of this incident will likely influence future legislation and public opinion as stakeholders grapple with protecting national safety while addressing the complexities of immigration policy.