Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

EXCLUSIVE: An undercover video captured last month sheds light on internal worries within the campaign of Abigail Spanberger, the Democratic candidate for governor in Virginia. A campaign organizer expressed doubts about her own candidate, stating that the upcoming election feels like it is set against a surreal backdrop of disappointing choices.
Fredrica-Maame Ama Deegbe, who previously identified herself as a campaign organizer for Spanberger, voiced her frustrations in a video released by Fox News Digital. The footage reveals her discontent not only with Spanberger’s history as a CIA officer but also with the Republican nominee, Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, whom she criticized harshly.
“CIA agent, literally, which is crazy, like yeah, vote for the CIA agent, guys, like what the f—,” Deegbe stated, reflecting her disillusionment.
Deegbe further lamented, “I don’t know what happened. We’re in like the darkest timeline. Our only choices are between a Black woman, which ordinarily I’m all for. But this time, do you think we should bring back slavery, Winsome? … Even with that, it’s like either vote for the Black woman who thinks that slavery should be brought back or vote for the White woman who was in the CIA.”
Despite expressing significant misgivings about the candidates, Deegbe admitted, “They pay me really, really good money” for her role in the Spanberger campaign.
Throughout her discussion, she critiqued the overarching dynamics of political campaigning, stating, “Working on the campaign made me realize that this is all a really big pyramid scheme. We’re all working for the betterment of not really a person but for what the person represents and what that representation is going to be for the rest of the nation.”
This sentiment reflects a growing concern about political marketing and the disconnect that campaign workers often feel from the candidates they support.
Deegbe likened her experience to a scene straight out of The Wizard of Oz, describing it as a situation filled with “smoke and mirrors and curtains.” She articulated a feeling of disconnection between the voters, the candidates, and how their campaigns convey messages to the public. “There’s such a disconnect between the person that we’re voting for, the work that we do, like the numerical aspect of it, like all of it doesn’t feel cohesive. It feels like I’m a sales representative,” she added.
As the campaign intensifies, Spanberger faces mounting scrutiny, particularly regarding her reluctance to distance herself from Jay Jones, a fellow Democratic candidate for attorney general. Jones has garnered criticism recently due to controversial text messages that emerged, which included violent remarks towards his political opponents.
Among these messages, Jones made alarming comments about GOP leaders in Virginia, including a fantasized scenario where he would consider extreme violence against then-House Speaker Todd Gilbert. Jones depicted Gilbert as worse than historical dictators, showing a troubling approach to political discourse.
In light of these unfolding events, both Spanberger and Earle-Sears are engaged in a competitive race with significant implications for the Democratic Party. The results of this election could be viewed as indicators ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, making it even more critical for both candidates to address the issues raised by their critics.
Polls suggest that Spanberger has enjoyed a statistical advantage over Earle-Sears as the election date approaches. However, her alignment with Jones has complicated her campaign. The criticisms regarding this endorsement could impact her perceived authenticity among potential voters.
Fox News Digital reached out for reactions from Deegbe, the Democratic Party of Virginia, the Spanberger campaign, and the Earle-Sears campaign, but had not received comments at the time of publication.
The comments from Deegbe highlight a vital aspect of political campaigns in contemporary America. Many grassroots workers, like campaign organizers, often grapple with moral dilemmas regarding their candidates. As campaigns become increasingly complex, it’s essential to consider the sentiments of those who work behind the scenes.
Understanding these internal perspectives can illuminate the broader issues that affect voter sentiment and engagement. The conflict between individual beliefs and party strategies often leads to discontent, which may ultimately influence how campaigns are received by the electorate.
As political dynamics continue to evolve, such insights are crucial. They remind us that elections are not solely about candidates but also about the ideals and representations they embody. The voices within campaigns, though often overlooked, can be instrumental in shaping public understanding and dialogue as the political landscape shifts before our eyes.