Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
On a recent episode, the co-hosts of ABC’s ‘The View’ expressed strong criticism of Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner following his revelation of a Nazi-themed tattoo. This controversial disclosure has sparked a heated debate regarding the suitability of candidates with questionable pasts in political roles.
Whoopi Goldberg, a veteran co-host of the show, posed a pointed question about Platner’s decision to keep his tattoo private until its public exposure. She stated that anyone aspiring to hold public office should be prepared for scrutiny of their past decisions. She highlighted this expectation by commenting, ‘If you’re going to run for office, your stuff’s going to come up.’ Goldberg further remarked on the importance of addressing these issues proactively instead of attempting to downplay them.
Co-host Sara Haines echoed Goldberg’s sentiments, emphasizing that Platner’s tattoo and his history of controversial Reddit posts could lead to significant mistrust among the electorate. Haines stated, ‘Although everyone has a past, not everyone can whip up an antisemitic or racist tattoo that they accidentally got on spring break when they were drinking.’ She underscored the gravity of his past actions by suggesting that they are far beyond mere ‘whoopsies’ and reassured viewers that there are numerous qualified candidates in Maine to consider.
In response to Haines, Joy Behar added that with a population of over 340 million in the United States, it raises the question of whether there truly could not be a competent candidate without such a controversial background.
Sunny Hostin brought attention to other Democrats defending Platner, who aims to unseat Republican Senator Susan Collins. Hostin, however, agreed with Haines that a flippant apology would not be sufficient in addressing the serious implications of Platner’s past behavior. ‘When you get to the point where you’re denying on a podcast that you’re a Nazi, I think it’s over,’ she stated, categorically dismissing Platner’s viability as a candidate.
Alyssa Farah Griffin, another co-host, commended the group for holding Platner accountable for this serious imagery, reflecting a uniform standard for behavior for all public officials, whether they identify as Democrats or Republicans. Griffin offered a strong opinion, stating, ‘If you’re Nazi-adjacent on the right or the left, you have no business being in public life. Step aside for someone else who could run for that seat.’
The co-hosts unanimously agreed that the scandal surrounding Platner’s tattoo was too significant to ignore or excuse, even considering his claims of inebriation at the time he obtained it. Their collective stance emphasized the importance of integrity among electoral candidates.
During the discussion, Goldberg also reflected on her own past behaviors, admitting to engaging in reckless activities during her younger years. She commented, ‘I can’t tell you that when I used to get drunk, I didn’t do stupid stuff, but I took responsibility for it.’ This admission served to highlight the distinction between youthful missteps and actions that carry deeper societal implications.
Following the backlash, Graham Platner’s campaign released a video featuring an interview on the ‘Pod Save America’ podcast, where he addressed his tattoo directly. He claimed the imagery, resembling the ‘Totenkopf,’ a symbol associated with Nazi SS units, was acquired in a Croatian tattoo parlor after a night of heavy drinking with fellow Marines in 2007. Platner reiterated that skulls and crossbones are common military symbols and insisted that he received the tattoo before obtaining a security clearance in the Army.
Additionally, revelations from Platner’s past surfaced last week, raising eyebrows among voters. Old Reddit posts featuring Platner’s controversial remarks from 2018 criticized the police and self-identified him as a ‘communist.’ In another post, he suggested that those fighting fascism should be well-armed, provoking further scrutiny of his political and social views.
As the criticism unfolds, the future of Graham Platner’s campaign remains uncertain. A growing number of voters in Maine may question his fitness for public office given the weight of recent disclosures and the reactions they are eliciting.
Ultimately, this incident has underscored the need for transparency and accountability among political candidates. As discussions continue to heat up, the emphasis on moral integrity and public confidence in their leaders gains renewed importance in light of these events.
