Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat from New York, expressed frustration on Tuesday regarding the Department of Justice’s lack of response to her inquiries about a potential federal investigation connected to a “Know Your Rights” immigration webinar she hosted in February. The lawmaker has been seeking clarity on whether she might face legal repercussions for sharing information about constitutional rights aimed at undocumented immigrants.
Ocasio-Cortez stated, “I’ve asked them, they haven’t responded to me. I was once again fully using the First Amendment to inform people of their constitutional rights.” Despite reaching out formally, she observed, “They won’t respond.” This silence raises questions about accountability and transparency within the Justice Department.
As discussions regarding her legal status heat up, Ocasio-Cortez highlighted the possible repercussions of a lawmaker being arrested by the Trump administration. She stated that detaining an elected official without substantial evidence would represent a significant shift in how power is wielded in the United States. Such an action could escalate tensions and undermine the principles that uphold a functioning democracy.
Furthermore, the representative underscored concerns that America’s allies might view the arrest of a sitting congress member as an authoritarian action. She urged the administration to consider the global ramifications of such a scenario, illustrating the delicate balance between domestic policy and international reputation.
In a daring move back in February, Ocasio-Cortez challenged Tom Homan, the Trump administration’s “border czar,” after he suggested he would refer her for prosecution based on her advice to immigrants about avoiding deportation. At a town hall meeting in Queens, she remarked, “I’m using my free speech rights to advise people of their constitutional protections. To that I say: Come for me, do I look like I care?” Her defiance illustrates her commitment to advocating for immigrant rights and standing up against what she sees as unjust actions.
Following Ocasio-Cortez’s remarks, Homan indicated he was working with the Department of Justice to clarify the boundaries of legal speech concerning immigration advice. He emphasized the need for Ocasio-Cortez to understand federal laws that categorize entering the U.S. illegally as a crime subject to deportation.
The atmosphere at public meetings has become increasingly charged. During a recent town hall, an attendee interrupted Ocasio-Cortez, shouting about allegations of genocide in Gaza, which exemplifies the passionate polarities surrounding her and her legislative efforts. Such incidents not only highlight domestic concerns but also reflect broader issues of political discourse.
In her letter to Attorney General Pamela Bondi, Ocasio-Cortez sought assurance that the DOJ had not succumbed to political pressure aimed at pursuing investigations against elected officials with whom they disagree. She demanded clarification on Homan’s threats of political prosecution against her and questioned the motivations behind these actions.
The Congresswoman wrote, “Tom Homan has gone on multiple forums threatening political prosecution against me, citing resources I distributed informing my constituents of their constitutional and legal rights.” Her letter emphasized the importance of educating the public, especially amid a climate of rising uncertainty and debate about immigration laws.
In her correspondence, Ocasio-Cortez referenced Homan’s prior announcement regarding the initiation of an investigation, emphasizing the constitutional protection of free speech. She argued that educating citizens about their rights is a fundamental responsibility of elected officials, which should not come under threat.
Ocasio-Cortez forcefully asserted, “A government that uses threats of DOJ investigations to suppress free speech is a threat to all, regardless of political ideology.” Her statement underscores a critical concern within the current political climate: the potential misuse of power to silence dissenting voices.
As of Tuesday, Ocasio-Cortez’s remarks suggested that the DOJ had overlooked the deadline she imposed in her letter for a response. Her proactive efforts to seek clarity on this matter reflect a growing tension between representation, free speech, and the administration’s stance on immigration policy.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the Justice Department for commentary on Ocasio-Cortez’s claims and the ongoing situation with her inquiries. The dialogue surrounding these events continues to unfold, with implications for civil liberties and the scope of legal protections in the current political landscape.
Reporting contributed by Michael Dorgan from Fox News Digital.