Author Reveals Mexico’s Alleged Strategy to Influence US Through Immigration

Author Reveals Mexico’s Alleged Strategy to Influence US Through Immigration

Investigative writer Peter Schweizer claims the Mexican government is orchestrating a calculated effort to influence activities within the United States. He suggests that this strategy encompasses diplomatic missions, educational programs, and migrant outreach initiatives, extending beyond conventional diplomatic practices.

In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital, Schweizer discussed his upcoming book, The Invisible Coup, scheduled for release on Tuesday. He describes a phenomenon he terms “weaponized immigration”—a tactic Mexican officials purportedly perceive as a method to exert political pressure within the U.S.

“Foreign powers are using migration as a weapon to undermine American sovereignty,” Schweizer asserted, emphasizing that Mexico epitomizes this approach.

The Diplomatic Landscape

Schweizer highlighted Mexico’s extensive diplomatic presence across the United States, noting that it operates 53 consulates nationwide, which is significantly more than many U.S. allies. This broad network facilitates a range of activities that transcend typical diplomatic protocols.

“These consular officials have been embroiled in organizing political activities within the United States, which constitutes a violation of their diplomatic status,” Schweizer, also the founder of the Government Accountability Institute, said.

Political Activity and Advocacy

Schweizer contended that officials from Mexican consulates have supported anti-ICE protests across the U.S. He referred to specific instances where these officials praised community mobilization in response to immigration enforcement actions, blurring the lines between legal assistance and political activism.

Moreover, Mexican consulates provide legal aid and outreach to migrant communities following ICE raids. While Mexican officials term these actions as “consular protection duties,” critics argue that they veer into the realm of political engagement.

Mexican Legislators in the U.S.

In his analysis, Schweizer pointed to the existence of so-called “migrant legislators”—elected Mexican officials residing in the United States who advocate for the interests of Mexicans living abroad. Although these officials do not hold American office, some engage in advocacy activities stateside, leading to questions about the extent of foreign political involvement in U.S. affairs.

Education and Assimilation Concerns

Schweizer claimed that the Mexican government actively discourages assimilation among migrants in the U.S. He cited government-produced Spanish-language textbooks distributed in American school districts as evidence. These materials reportedly aim to nurture a Mexican identity among children rather than a blended Mexican-American identity.

“The Mexican government provides school districts, from Los Angeles to Orlando, with textbooks intended to ensure that migrant children identify as Mexican first,” Schweizer stated. These textbooks, published by Mexico’s state textbook authority, are generally distributed via consulates, libraries, community centers, and occasionally schools that request them for heritage education.

According to Schweizer, the content of these textbooks presents a highly politicized view of American history, depicting the Mexican–American War in a manner that positions the United States as an adversary.

“One textbook describes the United States as the enemy,” he noted, expressing concerns that school districts may permit the inclusion of these materials without adequate scrutiny.

Alleged Coordination with Advocacy Groups

Schweizer further alleged that coordination exists between Mexican diplomatic missions and local advocacy groups, straddling a line that intersects with American electoral politics. He referenced a meeting in 2024 held at the Mexican consulate in Oklahoma City, attended by both Mexican diplomatic officials and Democratic Party activists.

“Discussions focused on how California and Arizona transitioned from red to blue, alongside strategies for influencing future elections across the country,” Schweizer recounted, citing what he described as a transcript from that gathering.

“Such involvement by diplomatic officials is inappropriate,” he argued.

Legal Implications and American Elections

When questioned about the legality of these actions, Schweizer asserted that foreign diplomats are barred from participating in American elections. He advocated for the expulsion of any officials breaching this protocol.

“We need a zero-tolerance policy,” he insisted. “As we prepare for the midterm elections, historical precedents indicate such interference cannot be tolerated.”

Media Outreach and Messaging

Schweizer also pointed out a Mexican government-backed streaming service named Migrant TV. This platform, launched to engage with migrants in the U.S., reportedly features content that is heavily pro-Kamala Harris and critical of then-President Trump.

“The portrayal of ICE officials as Nazis and fascists is concerning,” Schweizer stated. The channel, known as TV Migrante, debuted in March 2025, aiming to provide a voice to migrants and is accessible in both Mexico and the U.S.

Geopolitical Perspective

Schweizer believes that these issues merit consideration within a broader geopolitical context. He draws parallels to China’s utilization of diplomatic institutions and affiliated activist networks within the United States.

“The essential question remains: why do we tolerate these practices?” he challenged. “It is time to establish clear limits.”

Tensions Between Mexico and the U.S.

These allegations come at a time when relations between Washington and Mexico are increasingly strained. With President Trump warning of intensified actions against Mexican drug cartels and security lapses at the border, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum emphasizes the importance of cooperation and respect for national sovereignty.

Sheinbaum cites significant progress in combating cartels, decreasing migration, and collaborative security efforts with U.S. officials, yet warns against any infringement on Mexico’s territorial integrity.

Schweizer voices skepticism over these claims, maintaining that migration offers Mexico substantial economic and political leverage.

“Over $60 billion flows from the U.S. to Mexico in remittances annually,” he highlighted, noting the importance of this financial lifeline. In 2024, Mexico received approximately $62.5 billion in remittances from the U.S., according to BBVA Research economists.

“They consider immigration as a means to exert influence over the United States,” he concluded.

While Mexican officials assert that their consulates exist primarily to offer services and safeguard the rights of Mexican nationals abroad, they also emphasize collaborative efforts with Washington concerning security and border enforcement. The Mexican embassy did not respond to inquiries regarding Schweizer’s assertions.