Bipartisan Call for State Input on Immigration Policy from Governors

In a rare display of bipartisan collaboration, both a Democratic and a Republican governor have joined forces to advocate for state-level involvement in immigration policy. This message emerged from a recent gathering of the National Governors Association held in Washington, D.C.

Colorado Governor Jared Polis, a Democrat who chairs the National Governors Association, and Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt, a Republican, expressed their shared desire for states to play a significant role in immigration enforcement and the issuance of work permits.

“We want to ensure that we are included in discussions regarding immigration policy,” Polis stated during an interview. He emphasized that this sentiment resonates across the political spectrum, with support from both Democratic and Republican leaders.

States as Key Stakeholders in Immigration Decisions

Polis articulated a crucial point: States are acutely aware of their own labor needs and are capable of issuing work permits after thorough vetting processes. He remarked, “Let us grant these permits based on comprehensive background checks. This approach will bolster our economic growth.” His assertion comes against the backdrop of rising concerns over crime attributed to some migrant groups, particularly in Colorado.

Amidst increasing incidents involving the Tren de Aragua gang, Polis acknowledged the necessity of a coordinated approach between state and federal authorities. He described the current landscape as necessitating varying degrees of cooperation. Although Colorado has sanctuary-style laws that restrict local law enforcement from closely collaborating with federal agencies, Polis asserted that the relationship with federal law enforcement remains strong.

Advocating for Workforce Visas

Echoing Polis’s stance, Stitt urged President Trump to grant states the authority to distribute workforce visas. He stated, “I’ve long supported the idea of issuing workforce visas at the state level. It is essential for governors to match employers with employees in various sectors such as construction, agriculture, engineering, and aviation.”

Stitt’s advocacy for this approach highlights his belief in the need for localized solutions to workforce challenges, particularly as many industries grapple with labor shortages.

He humorously likened the situation to an NFL draft, suggesting that the U.S. should be able to select the very best talent for its workforce. Stitt emphasized, “Let’s be prudent about our immigration policies. By closing the border, we can ensure that the most qualified individuals are granted entry into our country.”

State Initiatives to Tackle Illegal Immigration

In addition to advocating for state authority in issuing work permits, Stitt has initiated Operation Guardian. This program, launched recently, aims to enhance collaboration between state and local law enforcement with federal agencies such as ICE to ensure the deportation of criminal immigrants.

Stitt elaborated on the importance of this initiative, stating, “We are actively assessing how many individuals currently imprisoned in Oklahoma are here illegally and what can be done to expedite their deportation. This is a necessary step to relieve the burden on taxpayers in our state.” His administration views combating illegal immigration as critical to maintaining public safety and budgetary integrity.

Balancing Enforcement and Humanitarian Concerns

Despite his firm stance on immigration enforcement, Stitt acknowledged that states must strike a balance in their approach. He critiqued a recent proposal from the Oklahoma State Department of Public Instruction that suggested verifying the immigration status of children enrolled in public schools.

“In Oklahoma, we recognize the importance of education and social welfare. We will not inquire about the immigration status of young children in schools,” Stitt remarked. He is aware of the implications such policies can have on children’s access to education and the broader community.

Internal Divisions Within the Republican Party

However, there seems to be tension within the Republican ranks regarding how strictly to enforce immigration laws. Oklahoma Superintendent of Public Instruction Ryan Walters has pushed back against Stitt’s position. He criticized the governor, stating, “It is unfortunate that Gov. Stitt is undermining President Trump’s America First agenda. We cannot afford to ignore the financial implications of illegal immigration on our taxpayers.”

Walters’ comments reflect a broader internal debate within the GOP over how to tackle immigration policy and whether strict measures should take precedence over a more measured approach.

The Path Forward: Collaborative Governance

As governors Polis and Stitt push for a more significant role in immigration policy, their bipartisan collaboration highlights a crucial shift in how states may impact federal immigration strategies. Both leaders have made compelling arguments for state input, showcasing the importance of tailoring immigration solutions to meet local needs.

This dynamic underscores the necessity for ongoing dialogue between state and federal officials. The evolving landscape of immigration policy will require creative approaches that address labor needs while ensuring public safety and adhering to the rule of law.

Ultimately, the call for state engagement in immigration policy represents a significant move towards more localized governance, emphasizing the vital role states play in shaping America’s future.