Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
In a compelling testimony during the murder trial of Karen Read, a Yale-educated brain surgeon revealed that John O’Keefe died due to injuries sustained from falling backwards and striking his head on frozen ground. This critical evidence came to light on Wednesday in a Massachusetts courtroom, offering insights into the circumstances surrounding O’Keefe’s tragic death.
Read, aged 45, faces charges of killing her boyfriend, 46-year-old O’Keefe, after allegedly hitting him with her 2021 Lexus SUV on January 29, 2022. The incident took place during a blizzard in Canton, Massachusetts, located approximately 20 miles south of Boston. Following the collision, it is alleged that Read left O’Keefe on the ground to succumb to the freezing conditions.
Impact Analysis and Hypothermia
Dr. Aizik Wolf, the surgeon who provided his expert testimony, emphasized that the traumatic head injury alongside hypothermia would not have caused immediate death. He noted, based on his extensive experience treating similar injuries during his career in Minneapolis, that the mechanics of the injury indicate a fall was involved.
“The only way he could get this kind of an injury was to fall backwards, hit the back of his head, and then the resulting energy forces going into his brain, into the base of his skull,” Dr. Wolf explained to the jury, responding to inquiries from special prosecutor Hank Brennan.
According to Dr. Wolf, O’Keefe suffered what he described as a classic blunt-trauma injury. He detailed how the impact fractured O’Keefe’s skull and resulted in noticeable bruising around his eyes, commonly known as “raccoon eyes.” This phenomenon occurs when soft tissue collides with a solid surface, causing severe trauma.
Death from Medical Complications
Dr. Wolf clarified the timeline of medical repercussions following such an injury. Typically, swelling of the brain would result in death within 24 to 48 hours. Surprisingly, some individuals can succumb to similar injuries in as little as one to three hours, especially under harsh conditions.
During the intense January storm, O’Keefe’s body temperature fell sharply. When emergency responders located him at 6 a.m., they recorded a shocking body temperature of only 80 degrees, which falls well below the threshold identified as severe hypothermia.
Implications for the Defense and Prosecution
The prosecution sees Dr. Wolf’s testimony as pivotal for the second count of involuntary manslaughter against Read. Grace Edwards, a Massachusetts defense attorney observing the trial, remarked that the prosecution will likely argue that if the jury cannot ascertain that Read killed O’Keefe intentionally, they should consider whether her actions, including the impact and subsequent neglect, constituted a wanton and reckless act contributing to O’Keefe’s death.
Dr. Wolf’s credentials presented substantial weight in the courtroom. As noted in his biography from the Miami Neuroscience Center, he is recognized as a world leader in the field, serving as the clinic’s director.
Defense Strategies in the Spotlight
The defense has positioned their argument around doubts regarding the direct connection between O’Keefe’s fatal injuries and the vehicle incident. Brief cross-examination conducted by attorney Robert Alessi explored different injuries sustained by O’Keefe. This questioning aimed to highlight that not all of the injuries linked to the head trauma can be traced back to a fall.
Edwards commented on Alessi’s strategy, saying he effectively dislodged Dr. Wolf’s narrative from a singular focus on head trauma to a more nuanced examination of other injuries, indicating that O’Keefe’s demise might have been influenced by factors beyond Read’s actions.
Involvement of Law Enforcement and Forensic Evidence
After Dr. Wolf’s testimony, Christina Hanley from the Massachusetts State Police Crime Lab returned to the stand. She specializes in analyzing glass and plastic fragments. Her earlier testimony, cut short the previous day, resumed as she elaborated on the evidence collected from the scene, including a broken cocktail glass discovered near O’Keefe’s body and remnants found on Read’s SUV.
Hanley stated that some plastic debris retrieved from O’Keefe’s clothing shared characteristics with the materials found from Read’s vehicle but could not definitively be traced back to it. Notably, none of the broken glass on Read’s bumper matched the shattered cocktail glass found at the scene.
Challenging the Investigation’s Integrity
During her cross-examination, defense attorney Alan Jackson sought clarity on the broken glass evidence, revealing that it only matched glass collected by a former trooper involved in the case. This trooper was dismissed after allegations surfaced regarding inappropriate conduct during the investigation. The defense proceeded to play video footage showing this former trooper positioned near Read’s vehicle during the investigation.
The embattled former trooper insists that his investigative methods were justified and conducted with integrity, a claim that now stands under intense scrutiny.
Potential Consequences for Karen Read
If convicted of the top charge of second-degree murder, Read could face a life sentence in prison. Additionally, she faces various charges, including drunken driving, manslaughter, and leaving the scene of a deadly incident, each carrying serious implications for her future.
The eyes of the public remain fixed on this case as it unfolds, illustrating the complexities of the legal system and the gravity of the allegations involved.
Report contributed by Fox News’ Andrew Fone.
