Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Flick International Empty outdoor track and field venue during a sunset with vibrant painted lanes

California Adjusts Girls’ Track Championship Rules Amid Transgender Athlete Controversy

California’s track and field state championships are undergoing a significant revision in eligibility criteria following a prominent controversy surrounding transgender athletes. This shift comes in the wake of President Donald Trump’s public criticism and threats regarding the participation of trans athletes in female sports.

On Tuesday, the California Interscholastic Federation, known as CIF, issued a statement to Fox News Digital. This announcement arrived mere hours after a Truth Social post from Trump indicated he might withhold federal funding from California over the issue. The federation declared that the upcoming competition will permit biologically female athletes, who may have missed out on qualifying, to participate in events they could have excelled in without the presence of a trans athlete.

The CIF asserted that they reached this decision following the recent CIF Masters Qualifiers. The organization’s statement emphasized the inclusion of female competitors, referred to as “biological female student-athletes,” as part of a careful reassessment of the competition’s rules.

The CIF’s statement expressed a commitment to supporting all student-athletes while ensuring adherence to California laws and educational codes. They introduced a pilot entry process for the 2025 CIF State Track and Field Championships, aiming to create additional opportunities for participants who might have qualified under different circumstances.

Changes to Qualifying Criteria

Under this new pilot system, any biological female student-athlete who would have achieved the necessary qualifying mark for their section’s automatic entries in the CIF State meet, but fell short at their Section meet, can now enter the 2025 championships. The CIF articulated that this adjustment aims to enhance participation opportunities for athletes regardless of the challenges they faced during qualifications.

Currently, the CIF is also facing an ongoing federal Title IX investigation launched by the U.S. Department of Education. This scrutiny intensifies amid the unfolding situation surrounding trans athletes and their participation in school sports.

This latest rule change potentially allows at least two additional competitors to qualify for state titles, after they narrowly missed traditional qualification measures during the qualifiers held on Saturday. Notably, a trans-identified athlete from Jurupa Valley High School secured first place in both the triple jump and long jump during this event.

Trump’s Truth Social post did not name the specific school or athlete involved in the situation, but it highlighted growing tensions around policies governing gender identity in athletics. Following this, the Jurupa Unified School District issued a statement reaffirming its commitment to adhering to California law and CIF regulations regarding student-athlete participation based on gender identity.

District Response and Policy Commitments

The Jurupa Unified School District’s statement clarified that California law and CIF policies require attributing participation in athletic teams based on a student’s gender identity, irrespective of what is listed in school records. District officials emphasized their commitment to providing a safe and inclusive environment for all students while following existing laws.

This controversy finds additional context in Trump’s previous actions, including signing the “No Men’s in Women’s Sports” executive order earlier this year. The CIF was among the first high school organizations to declare it would not comply with this order, opting instead to uphold California’s established regulations concerning gender identity in sports.

In recent weeks, the CIF has faced backlash, notably for an incident where officials reportedly asked female athletes to remove t-shirts stating “Protect Girls Sports” during a sectional qualifier. The CIF subsequently confirmed the incident and explained that the uniforms of student-athletes must adhere to school-issued guidelines while on the field.

In May, the U.S. Department of Education issued a warning to California regarding these practices, emphasizing federal civil rights considerations concerning trans athlete participation. The investigation into CIF’s actions continues, reflecting broader concerns about equity and rights within school sports.

A Call for Timely Action

In an interview following her competition against the trans athlete, La Canada High School’s Katie McGuiness spoke out, urging the CIF to promptly revise its policies. McGuiness highlighted that her objection is not personal against any individual athlete, but rather aimed at the need for systemic change to ensure fairness in competitions.

Since 2014, California has allowed trans athletes to compete in accordance with their gender identity due to the passage of Assembly Bill 1266. This law has sparked several disputes surrounding the participation of trans athletes in women’s sports, further complicating the landscape of high school athletics in the state.

Recent incidents include a controversial volleyball case at San Jose State involving accusations of mishandling athlete inclusion and, an ongoing lawsuit over roster decisions impacting female athletes in Riverside Unified School District.

Nationally, Trump’s administration has focused much of its legal attention against transgender athlete policies in Maine, characterized by a series of lawsuits and federal inquiries concerning various state laws.

As the CIF navigates this evolving landscape of policies, it seeks to accommodate demands for fairness while honoring existing laws. The organization aims to implement reforms that address concerns from various stakeholders amidst a charged national conversation on the intersection of sports, gender identity, and civil rights.

Moving forward, the CIF is likely to face continued scrutiny as it attempts to balance inclusivity with fairness in competitive sports. The ramifications of recent decisions will influence the sports community within California and beyond.