Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

A California pastor is urging families to consider leaving the state if a controversial bill aimed at expanding caregiver rights over children passes. Pastor Jack Hibbs, from Calvary Chapel Chino Hills, voiced significant concerns about the potential implications of the proposed legislation.
In an interview with Fox News Digital, Hibbs stated, “Legal experts have concluded that this very well might be the worst, most dangerous legislation that has ever come out of California. If this bill passes, you have to grab your kid and leave the state for your child’s protection.” This rallying cry has galvanized many parents and concerned citizens.
Hibbs is leading a rally at the state Capitol in Sacramento, focusing on pressing Governor Gavin Newsom to veto Assembly Bill 495, known as the Family Preparedness Plan Act. This legislation aims to offer protections for immigrant children at risk of family separation due to immigration enforcement actions.
The bill permits a caregiver who is either a relative or has established a familial or mentoring relationship with a child to sign a caregiver’s authorization affidavit. This affidavit would grant legal authority to enroll a minor in school and consent to school-related medical care on their behalf.
Opponents of the bill, including Hibbs and other parental rights advocates, are expressing serious concern that the legislation is too broad and threatens parental authority. They argue it could diminish parents’ rights to make critical decisions regarding their children’s education and health.
According to the text of the bill, schools are not obligated to conduct thorough investigations or inquiries regarding the caregivers. Notably, schools would not need to obtain parental consent, verify photo identification, or conduct background checks on those executing the affidavit. While the affidavit requires a driver’s license number, it allows caregivers to alternatively provide a Social Security or Medi-Cal number.
Hibbs noted that several legal experts he consulted with described the bill as a “human trafficker, pedophile, and kidnapper’s dream come true.” This grave characterization has raised alarms among many who fear the legislation could be exploited by individuals with malicious intent.
Hibbs cautioned that if AB 495 is enacted, similar legislation could emerge in other liberal states, spreading the potential risk nationwide.
The pastor emphasized that California’s current Education Code 234.7 already provides safeguards for immigrant students within educational institutions concerning immigration enforcement actions. He believes that this existing framework offers adequate protection without complicating parental rights.
Hibbs expresses a desire not only to raise awareness about the bill’s potential dangers but also to hold Governor Newsom accountable for his decisions regarding it. With speculation surrounding Newsom’s aspirations for a 2028 presidential run, Hibbs urged Californians to pressure the governor to act in the best interests of families.
“This is where Newsom must be stopped,” Hibbs remarked, calling on the public to make the governor accountable if he endorses the bill. He stated, “Let’s make him own this bill. Let’s tie it around his neck and let it be a letter that he wears to show he has no regard for parental rights and no regard for federal law.” Such rhetoric aims to resonate with concerned constituents who cherish their familial rights.
In response to these concerns, Assemblywoman Celeste Rodriguez, a sponsor of AB 495, sought to clarify the bill’s intentions. In a publicly released FAQ document, she pointed out that the bill does not create any form of legal or physical custody under California law. Despite this assertion, many skeptics remain unconvinced.
Efforts to contact Rodriguez and Governor Newsom’s office for further comments have not yielded a response as of this writing. This silence may compound concerns for those wary of the impact of AB 495.
The rally led by Hibbs is just one visible sign of broader parental concerns in California. Community sentiment appears divided, with some advocating for stronger protections for immigrant families, while others prioritize parental authority in education and health decisions.
The discussions surrounding AB 495 highlight a crucial intersection of rights and protections that resonate deeply with the values of many Californians. As the legislative process unfolds, the outcomes could set significant precedents for parental rights both within California and potentially across the nation.
The fate of AB 495 rests in the hands of lawmakers and those advocating for parental rights. As similar bills could arise in other states, the implications extend beyond California’s borders. This situation embodies the rising tensions in state and national conversations about family rights, immigration policies, and children’s welfare.
As the rally unfolds and more discussions emerge, parents, advocates, and lawmakers will continue navigating these complex issues that affect families throughout the state and the country.