Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The unsettling death of a Philadelphia teacher has reignited demands for a federal investigation as evidence suggests possible corruption within local law enforcement. Former Pennsylvania state trooper Tom Brennan, who has spent over a decade investigating the case of Ellen Greenberg, argues that significant irregularities warrant scrutiny from the Justice Department.
Recent developments in the case have intensified scrutiny on the official ruling of Greenberg’s death. Once classified as a suicide following 20 stab wounds, the narrative is now being questioned after the forensic pathologist, Dr. Marlon Osbourne, reversed his findings. Notably, Osbourne had initially ruled the incident a homicide before swiftly changing his determination to suicide after an undisclosed meeting with police.
This meeting, the details of which remain shrouded in secrecy, has raised alarm bells for private investigator Brennan. He argues that its very nature prompts the need for a federal investigation, purportedly revealing layers of corruption that may exist within the local justice system.
Greenberg’s parents have long sought a renewed examination of their daughter’s case. Initially, Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner elevated the case to the state attorney general’s office, then led by Josh Shapiro, due to a conflict of interest arising from a past attorney-client relationship.
However, subsequent inaction under Shapiro’s administration has frustrated Brennan and the Greenberg family. He recently expressed his disdain for politicians who fail to deliver justice, saying, “I can’t stand a lying politician.” Such sentiments stem from a perception that political ambitions may have driven Shapiro’s handling of the case.
Brennan, who served as an undercover detective investigating white-collar crime in Philadelphia, has highlighted possible conflicts affecting Shapiro’s handling of the case. Recent allegations surfaced that Shapiro had ties to the family of Greenberg’s fiancé, who were reported as campaign donors.
In light of these allegations, Shapiro’s office announced his recusal from the investigation, asserting he did not possess an actual conflict but acknowledged the appearance of one. Brennan further contends that Shapiro hired a former prosecutor associated with Greenberg’s case, complicating the impartiality of any review by the attorney general’s office.
Ultimately, the investigation was handed over to the Chester County District Attorney’s Office, which reviewed the case extensively. After two years of investigation under Democratic DA Deb Ryan, the office concluded there was insufficient evidence to bring charges. Concerns about evidence mishandling have lingered, with reports indicating that crucial physical evidence was destroyed before investigators arrived.
Another layer of complexity emerged when it was disclosed that a Pennsylvania judge, uniquely tied to Greenberg’s fiancé, may have compromised the investigation by removing items from the crime scene before police could secure the area.
Ellen Greenberg’s death occurred on January 26, 2011. Her fiancé claimed he discovered her lifeless body in their apartment during a snowstorm. At the time of her death, she was in the midst of planning her wedding, an indication that contradicted the suicide narrative.
Moreover, eyewitness accounts paint a contradictory picture, with Brennan noting that first responders found her fiancé dressed in different clothing than captured in earlier surveillance footage. Such discrepancies have led to mounting skepticism about the circumstances surrounding her death.
The autopsy report has also come under scrutiny. The defensive wounds, including multiple stabs inflicted from behind, have drawn skepticism. Experts now suggest that some wounds were likely delivered post-mortem, raising significant doubts about the initial ruling of suicide. A subsequent independent autopsy detected signs of manual strangulation on top of the stab wounds.
Brennan highlights that a thorough review of the evidence should have prompted alternative conclusions regarding the cause of death. Guy D’Andrea, a former homicide prosecutor, has vocalized similar disagreements with the suicide ruling, reinforcing the need for a more rigorous examination of the case.
In a striking turn of events, Dr. Osbourne changed his initial suicide ruling just last month, indicating that new evidence could alter the course of the investigation. He acknowledged the existence of information previously untapped in forming his professional opinion.
Days following this revelation, the City of Philadelphia settled a lawsuit with Greenberg’s parents, alleging a conspiracy involving local authorities to mischaracterize Ellen’s death. These legal developments continue to support allegations of a concealed intent within the investigation.
Brennan remains adamant that a federal probe into the Philadelphia investigation is necessary to shed light on what he perceives as a concerted effort to mask a homicide. He emphasizes the need for accountability, urging for a transparent investigation.
“You have people who are actually trying to hide a homicide,” he stated, calling for action from federal authorities. Brennan hopes to see a Republican U.S. attorney appointed in Philadelphia to champion the cause for justice in Greenberg’s case.
As allegations unfold and public interest grows, the Greenberg family continues to seek clarity in what they believe to be an unresolved tragedy. The echoes of their pursuit for justice resound loudly amid claims of betrayal within the local justice system.
It remains to be seen whether a federal investigation will be pursued, but for now, the case of Ellen Greenberg stands as a testament to the potential ties between politics and justice in Philadelphia.
Fox News’ Mollie Markowitz contributed to this report.