Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

In a compelling response to a recent opinion piece in the Wall Street Journal, Stephen A. Smith voiced his support for a federal investigation into the WNBA’s treatment of rising basketball star Caitlin Clark. The piece had drawn attention for addressing controversial physical plays against Clark regarding her performance as players face increasing scrutiny.
The Wall Street Journal article, titled ‘The WNBA and Caitlin Clark’s Civil Rights,’ ignited widespread discussion this week. It argued that Clark, a rookie sensation in 2024, has been subjected to a hostile environment on the court due to inconsistent officiating and physicality directed toward her during games. The article called for a federal probe into these alarming practices that could potentially constitute civil rights violations against Clark.
During a recent episode of his show, Smith emphasized that while he is not implying the government would necessarily win any ensuing case, he believes the argument for an investigation is compelling. He highlighted the significant disparity in treatment between Clark and other players, suggesting that the issue could resonate deeply within the political landscape.
“I’m not here saying the case will be won by the government if it gets to this point. I’m saying they have a case, they have an argument,” Smith remarked. His comments raise questions about the WNBA’s accountability regarding its players’ safety and well-being.
Smith went further by suggesting that political figures, particularly former President Donald Trump, could leverage an investigation to galvanize support among their followers. He pointed out that should Clark’s treatment be perceived as excessive, it could become a matter of national, and potentially international, significance.
“Do we doubt that at his discretion, if he finds this to be politically expedient, that Trump won’t use this to feed his base?” Smith queried. He referenced how public acknowledgment of Clark’s mistreatment could lead to wider discussions on civil rights within sports.
Drawing parallels to recent civil rights settlements, Smith noted agreements reached between elite institutions like Columbia University and Harvard University with the Trump administration regarding claims of civil rights violations. Smith expressed concern that if significant financial settlements could be reached in those cases, the WNBA’s handling of Clark warrants similar scrutiny.
“If the Trump administration can settle with Columbia for $221 million over issues on campus, you think you can definitively rule out the noise that could be made if the WNBA continues to allow this treatment of Caitlin Clark?” he asked.
Caitlin Clark’s teammate, Sophie Cunningham, has emerged as one of the most vocal advocates for protecting Clark. Cunningham has openly criticized not only the physical treatment Clark faces but also the overall mentality among some players and referees not to protect one of the league’s brightest stars.
Previously a member of the Phoenix Mercury, Cunningham disclosed how rival teams aimed to toughen up Clark during her rookie season. She reflected on conversations within her former team, indicating that measures to assert physical dominance were seen as part of the initiation into the league.
“You have seen players in our league trying to toughen up Caitlin… Even when I wasn’t her teammate, I knew the talks that Phoenix had in the locker room, like, ‘No, we’re going to show her what the W really is.’ I understand the mentality to a certain extent, but there’s just more for her,” Cunningham explained in a recent podcast episode.
Now playing alongside Clark, Cunningham has witnessed firsthand the mounting pressure and aggression towards her teammate and expressed that players must do more to protect one another. “And now being on her team and seeing it, I’m like, ‘What are people doing?’ It’s too much. Even I think it’s too much, and if that’s the case, it probably is,” she stated.
Cunningham recently defended Clark in a heated match against the Connecticut Sun. The confrontation arose after a series of fouls against Clark, culminating in an on-court altercation that displayed Cunningham’s commitment to safeguarding her teammate.
In reflecting on the incident, Cunningham recalled Clark’s reaction in the locker room, where she expressed relief that at least some measure of protection had been offered. “In the locker room, she goes, ‘Finally!’ I think it very much brought our team together. Everyone felt a sense of responsibility to protect each other,” Cunningham said about the critical moment.
The scuffle detailed earlier this season highlights a growing concern among players about the enforcement of rules and the perceived leniency exhibited in officiating during women’s sports. Cunningham called for better protection for Clark, stating that the referees have contributed to a buildup of frustration regarding how star players are treated over time.
“At the end of the day, I’m going to protect my teammates. That’s what I do,” Cunningham asserted. Her bold stance not only emphasizes her commitment to Clark but also serves as a rallying cry for improved standards in player protection across women’s sports.
As discussions around Caitlin Clark’s treatment gain momentum, the need for change within the WNBA becomes increasingly apparent. Advocates like Smith and Cunningham spotlight critical issues surrounding player safety and civil rights, prompting urgent calls for an investigation into the league’s practices.
With the eyes of the basketball world trained on them, WNBA officials must reflect on these concerns and prioritize the well-being of their athletes. The evolution of women’s basketball depends on how issues of bias, treatment, and fairness are addressed, ensuring a safer environment for stars like Caitlin Clark.