Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Chris Matthews Highlights Disturbing Parallels in Deportation Practices
Former MSNBC host Chris Matthews sparked controversy during a recent appearance on “The Jim Acosta Show” when he likened President Donald Trump’s deportation policies to actions taken by Adolf Hitler during the Holocaust. This comparison arose from the deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, an alleged MS-13 gang member.
Matthews spoke candidly with Jim Acosta, noting that the discussion began with Acosta wanting to address some pressing news topics before reminiscing about the past. However, Matthews had a pointed observation prepared that would guide their conversation.
Understanding the Historical Context
During their discussion, Matthews explicitly stated, “What did Hitler do in the Holocaust? He took people from Germany to other countries.” This statement drew a nod from Acosta, who seemed to recognize the gravity of the comparison.
Comparisons to Current Events
Matthews elaborated on his comparison by referencing the historical lack of legal justification that the Nazi regime employed during the Holocaust. He explained that there was no semblance of law when people were forcibly removed from Germany to countries like Poland and Hungary, where many met tragic fates.
Acosta queried Matthews about whether he saw a parallel in the current deportation practices of the Trump administration, particularly regarding Garcia’s case, referring to the conditions in places like the El Salvadoran detention center.
“And so when you see what’s happening right now with this El Salvadoran Gulag, I mean, this CECOT Gulag, he’s basically taking a page out of that playbook, you think?” Acosta asked.
Matthews’ Perspective on Deportations
In response, Matthews suggested that these deportation actions facilitate Trump’s agenda of removing individuals from the country without proper consideration for their situations. “Well it gets them out of the country,” he stated, focusing on what actions he would take if he were present during a meeting between Trump and El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele.
Allegations of Cruelty in Policy
As the conversation progressed, Acosta raised concerns about the implications of the Trump administration’s policies. He accused the administration of inflicting unnecessary cruelty on Garcia, serving as a deterrent for others considering illegal immigration.
Acosta articulated, “There’s a component here that is deeply disturbing because it seems to be all about inflicting cruelty. It’s all about making an example out of this person and saying, ‘We’re going to be cruel to this guy, and so you better not come here. We’re going to be cruel to you too.'” His comments prompted further agreement from Matthews.
Negotiation Tactics and International Relations
Matthews further insisted that the Trump administration’s approach extends beyond domestic policies, alleging that cruelty has become a tactic in negotiations with international allies. He explained, “Big time, we do that to Canada. They’re all coming to me. They have to come to me and, quote, kiss my a–.’” According to Matthews, this kind of rhetoric is aimed at humiliating other nations.
The former host concluded by highlighting the troubling use of such schoolyard tactics in serious international diplomacy, indicating a troubling trend in how the administration operates.
Engaging with Underlying Issues
Through this dialogue, the conversation underscored deep concerns surrounding immigration policies and their moral implications. The governor’s comments reflect broader sentiments expressed by critics of the Trump administration’s approach to immigration enforcement.
While Matthews and Acosta’s discussion concentrated on Abrego Garcia, it also raised significant questions about how policies can affect individuals and communities at large.
Fox News Digital has reached out to the White House for commentary on these allegations and the ongoing immigration policy debates.
