Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A Colombian woman residing illegally in the United States has been charged with multiple offenses, including voting unlawfully and fraudulently obtaining over $400,000 in taxpayer-funded benefits, according to federal prosecutors on Thursday.
Lina Maria Orovio-Hernandez, aged 59, is accused of using a stolen identity for more than two decades. She allegedly gained welfare benefits, acquired a REAL ID, and secured eight other state IDs, as detailed by the Justice Department.
In January 2023, Orovio-Hernandez purportedly submitted a fraudulent voter registration. She cast her vote during the 2024 presidential election. Surveillance footage reportedly captured her at a bank on November 5, 2024, proudly displaying an “I voted” sticker.
Extensive Charges Against Orovio-Hernandez
The charges against Orovio-Hernandez include false representation of a Social Security number, making a false statement in an application for a U.S. passport, aggravated identity theft, and fraudulent voting. Since February, she has been held in federal custody on these allegations.
Fraudulent Benefits Overview
Prosecutors assert that Orovio-Hernandez wrongfully collected approximately $400,000 in federal benefits. This sum encompasses around $259,589 in Section 8 rental assistance from October 2011 to January 2025. Furthermore, she obtained about $101,257 in Social Security disability benefits from July 2014 through January, and approximately $43,348 in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits from April 2005 to January.
Official Statements on the Case
U.S. Attorney Leah B. Foley commented on the extensive nature of Orovio-Hernandez’s alleged actions, stating that for over 20 years, she built a life based on a stolen identity. Foley emphasized the seriousness of her voting illegally in a presidential election while collecting significant government benefits meant for citizens in need.
Foley further remarked, “The right to vote is one of the many privileges of being a U.S. citizen. Government-funded programs for those in need are designed as safety nets for lawful residents, not as support for illegal aliens devoid of rights.”
Seeking U.S. Citizenship Through Fraud
Authorities also revealed that Orovio-Hernandez applied for a U.S. passport, falsely claiming citizenship by asserting she was born in Puerto Rico. This fraudulent move further exemplifies her attempts to exploit the system.
Foley reaffirmed that Orovio-Hernandez was not entitled to any of the benefits she received due to her illegal status in the United States.
Implications for Social Security Programs
Amy Connelly, special agent in charge for the Social Security Administration’s Office of the Inspector General in the Boston-New York area, highlighted the gravity of identity theft in this case. She stated, “Stealing someone’s identity to unlawfully obtain Social Security benefits is not just theft—it’s a long-term abuse of a system meant to support those truly in need.”
Ongoing Discussions on Immigration and Fraud
This case has reignited discussions regarding immigration policy and the safeguards needed to prevent such fraudulent activities. Experts suggest that further measures may be necessary to ensure that government programs effectively serve those who comply with the law.
As the investigation continues, this ongoing case serves as a critical reminder of the challenges faced by federal authorities in battling identity theft and fraud. Law enforcement agencies remain vigilant, highlighting the importance of maintaining the integrity of public assistance programs.
Orovio-Hernandez’s case underscores not only the individual acts of fraud but also calls attention to larger systemic issues that may allow such abuses to persist. Stricter oversight and verification processes may be essential to protect public resources.
A Call for Reform
Advocates for reform argue that while protecting citizens’ rights and safeguarding taxpayer funds are paramount, contextual understanding of the complexities surrounding immigration is also necessary. Balancing these elements will require careful consideration and policy adjustments in the future.
As this case develops, it will be crucial to monitor the response from both the judicial system and broader community discussions. The implications extend beyond Orovio-Hernandez, touching upon national security, integrity in voting processes, and the responsible administration of government aid systems.
