Flick International A cozy, dimly lit late-night television studio set with a sleek desk and iconic armchair, evoking the absence of a host.

Conan O’Brien Predicts the Future of Late-Night Television and Stephen Colbert’s Destiny

Conan O’Brien Predicts the Future of Late-Night Television and Stephen Colbert’s Destiny

During a recent award acceptance speech, Conan O’Brien conveyed a stark outlook on the future of late-night television. He emphasized the impending decline of the traditional format while simultaneously offering bold insights into Stephen Colbert’s career path.

O’Brien, celebrated for his hosting tenure on NBC’s “Late Night” and “Tonight Show” from 1993 to 2010, also helmed the TBS talk show “Conan” for nearly eleven years. His statements emerged during his induction into the Television Academy Hall of Fame, an event held on Saturday.

He expressed, “Yes, late-night television, as we have known it since around 1950, is going to disappear. However, the unique voices of talents like Stephen Colbert are not going anywhere.” O’Brien further suggested that Colbert would adapt to a new format, one in which he would have complete control, stating that the host will evolve and shine brighter than ever.

Meanwhile, Fox News host Greg Gutfeld is thriving within the late-night landscape. As of July 20, 2025, “Gutfeld!” averaged an impressive 3.1 million viewers, significantly outperforming CBS’s outgoing “The Late Show,” which attracted 1.9 million viewers. In comparison, ABC’s “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” brought in 1.5 million, NBC’s “The Tonight Show starring Jimmy Fallon” had a viewership of 1.1 million, and NBC’s “Late Night with Seth Meyers” recorded 751,000.

The Future of Colbert’s Show

Colbert’s presence on CBS began in 2015 when he took over “The Late Show” from David Letterman. However, the spotlight on his show has a looming expiration date. CBS announced that “The Late Show” will conclude in May 2026, with no immediate plans for a replacement host.

Supporters of Colbert have voiced concerns regarding the motivations behind the show’s cancellation. Some allege that his frequent critiques of former President Donald Trump played a role in the decision. This speculation intensified, especially considering that parent company Paramount was seemingly aligned with Trump’s administration during crucial moments related to a corporate merger.

A juxtaposition to this narrative emerged in analyses from major publications, including The Washington Post and The New York Times. They assert that the cancellation of Colbert’s show pertains more to its outdated format than to political pressures.

Industry Dynamics and Financial Backdrop

The dynamic landscape of late-night television reflects a significant shift in viewer preferences, with many migrating toward streaming services. Reports indicate that Colbert’s show was incurring hefty losses, costing CBS around $40 million a year as traditional television struggles to maintain its audience.

Amidst this backdrop, the tensions heightened when Trump sued Paramount for allegedly engaging in election interference. Reports surfaced about CBS’s “60 Minutes” editing an interview with then–Vice President Kamala Harris in a misleading way during the 2024 election. Following a notable settlement involving payments to Trump, Colbert quipped that the $16 million settlement was effectively a “big fat bribe.”
O’Brien’s acceptance speech revealed a thoughtful reflection on the ongoing challenges within the television industry. He maintained an optimistic perspective about storytelling, proposing that no matter the advancements in technology, the essence of compelling narratives and inspired performances will endure.

O’Brien stated, “Technology can do whatever they want. It can transform television into a pill or a high-protein capsule, but it won’t matter if the stories resonate and if the artists involved are brave and goodwill-driven.” His remarks encapsulated a profound belief in the power of creativity and the importance of authenticity in television.

Looking Forward

As the industry approaches significant transitions in viewer habits and show formats, O’Brien’s insights serve as a reminder that while traditional formats may fade, innovation and talent will likely emerge in new and unexpected ways. The essence of television might evolve further, but the core principles of good storytelling and genuine performances will remain foundational.

In an era marked by rapid technological changes, both O’Brien and Colbert remind audiences of the necessity for originality and resilience in the face of industry upheaval. The future may be uncertain, yet the call for talented creators to embrace their craft remains ever pertinent.