Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Flick International Close-up view of a disassembled solar power inverter with hidden communication devices

Concerns Rise Over Security Risks Linked to Chinese-Made Solar Power Inverters

Concerns Rise Over Security Risks Linked to Chinese-Made Solar Power Inverters

U.S. energy officials are reassessing the potential security risks posed by Chinese-manufactured devices crucial to renewable energy infrastructure. Recent discoveries of unauthorized communication equipment embedded within some of these devices have raised alarms among experts familiar with the investigation.

Power inverters, which are primarily manufactured in China, serve a vital function by connecting solar panels and wind turbines to electricity grids. They are also integral components in batteries, heat pumps, and electric vehicle chargers. These devices allow remote updates and maintenance access, leading many utility companies to implement firewalls as a security measure against unauthorized communication back to China.

However, investigations have uncovered rogue communication devices that were not listed in product specifications. These devices were spotted within certain Chinese solar power inverters when U.S. experts dismantled equipment attached to grids to identify potential security vulnerabilities.

Undocumented communication devices, including cellular radios, have also been identified in batteries supplied by various Chinese manufacturers over the past nine months. The full scope of the affected solar power inverters and batteries remains unclear, as reported by sources familiar with the matter.

The presence of these unauthorized components offers additional communication channels that could potentially bypass established firewalls. Experts warn that this could have disastrous implications, including the remote shutdown of equipment or unauthorized adjustments to inverter settings, which may destabilize power grids.

Mike Rogers, a former director of the U.S. National Security Agency, stated that there is a belief within the Chinese government of the strategic value in compromising core infrastructure, putting Western nations at a disadvantage regarding security protocols.

A representative from the Chinese embassy in Washington denied these claims. The spokesperson added that such allegations distort and smear China’s infrastructure advancements, emphasizing the need for objective dialogue on technology.

Potential Dangers of Rogue Devices

The unauthorized communication devices could lead to severe outcomes. Experts explain that the ability to remotely control these inverters may pose catastrophic risks to energy infrastructure, raising the possibility of widespread blackouts.

Reports suggest that entities may exploit these vulnerabilities to initiate significant disruptions to power supplies. Utilities are now preparing for forthcoming bans on specific Chinese inverter stock. Companies like Florida Power & Light are proactively exploring alternative sources for equipment to minimize reliance on Chinese manufacturing.

Legislative Action and National Security

As U.S.-China relations continue to fray, there is an ongoing reassessment regarding China’s involvement in critical infrastructure due to emerging security vulnerabilities. Representative August Pfluger remarked on the increasing threat from the Chinese Communist Party, emphasizing the urgency to show that compromising U.S. infrastructure will not be tolerated.

In February, bipartisan legislative efforts led to the introduction of the Decoupling from Foreign Adversarial Battery Dependence Act. This legislation aims to prohibit the Department of Homeland Security from procuring batteries from specific Chinese corporations starting in October 2027, citing national security concerns.

This bill is currently under review by the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, with advocates emphasizing the importance of securing essential energy components from adversaries linked to the Chinese Communist Party.

Addressing Security Concerns in Renewable Energy

Utilities and companies are collectively acknowledging the escalating threat that Chinese technology poses to national energy grids. The Department of Energy has indicated that ongoing evaluations of emerging technologies and potential risks are critical, especially as the industry seeks enhanced disclosures from manufacturers about functionalities.

Amid rising energy insecurity, the Department is working to establish stronger domestic supply chains, facilitating the integration of more trusted equipment into the power grid. This includes the development of a Software Bill of Materials, a necessary step to enhance transparency in technology procurement.

Global Market Context and Industry Response

As the world’s largest supplier of power inverters, Huawei commands nearly 29 percent of the global market, followed by Chinese competitors such as Sungrow and Ginlong Solis. Despite past accusations of security risks, Huawei remains a dominant entity in various markets outside the U.S. Notably, German solar developer 1Komma5 has chosen to avoid Huawei inverters, citing security concerns that have gained increasing attention.

Experts warn that the growing reliance on Chinese inverters has intensified the security dilemma in renewable energy sectors. With over 200 gigawatts of solar power in Europe connected to Chinese-made inverters, the implications of a coordinated control over several installations could spell disaster for grid stability.

International Efforts to Mitigate Risks

Countries such as Lithuania and Estonia are also following suit by implementing measures to curtail reliance on potentially harmful technology. Lithuania passed legislation that blocks remote access capabilities from Chinese technology in significant solar and wind installations. This law may be extended to smaller systems, recognizing the potential risks to their energy security.

Estonian officials conveyed similar sentiments, stressing the potential for economic blackmail if critical infrastructure remains tied to Chinese suppliers. They highlighted the government’s preemptive efforts to mitigate these risks before it’s too late.

The Need for Scrutiny of Energy Infrastructure

The threat posed by Chinese technology extends beyond mere financial implications. Experts agree that security assessments surrounding energy infrastructure have often lagged behind other sectors, such as telecommunications. The ongoing review of Chinese renewable energy technology by the British government reinforces the urgency of rigorous scrutiny in this area.

Earlier incidents involving the disabling of Chinese solar power inverters in the U.S. demonstrated the tangible risks associated with foreign influence over energy resources. While the specifics regarding the nature or extent of disruptions remain unclear, the situation further highlights the potential vulnerability of national power supplies. Security analysts believe that even small installations contribute significantly to current power generation, underscoring the need for comprehensive security standards across the board.

NATO officials have also recognized the intensifying attempts by China to infiltrate member states’ critical economic infrastructure. They emphasize the importance of identifying strategic dependencies and mitigating associated risks to enhance security across allied nations.