Congress Prepares to Challenge California’s Ambitious Gas Car Ban

Congress Prepares to Challenge California’s Ambitious Gas Car Ban

EXCLUSIVE REPORT: A significant development is unfolding in Congress as a critical House committee moves to obstruct a key decision stemming from the Biden administration that could impact the auto industry in California. This state has been recognized as the nation’s most progressive stronghold in environmental policies.

On Wednesday evening, Representative John Joyce, a Republican from Pennsylvania and vice chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Committee, introduced a resolution aimed at disapproving a waiver granted by the Biden administration. This waiver allows California to pursue a total ban on the sale of new gas-powered vehicles by the year 2035.

The resolution has garnered the support of committee Chairman Brett Guthrie, a Republican from Kentucky, who characterized this waiver as a “de facto electric vehicle mandate” for California, indicating the far-reaching implications of such a policy.

Guthrie expressed his opinion to Fox News Digital, stating, “The American people should choose what vehicle is right for them, not California bureaucrats. Congressman Joyce’s resolution would block a disastrous ban on gas-powered vehicles that millions of Americans rely on every day.” He further noted that the Energy and Commerce Committee has been actively addressing this issue ever since California first proposed its EV mandate.

Joyce branded his resolution as “long overdue,” emphasizing the need for legislative intervention. “Since arriving in Washington, I have fought to protect consumer freedom and allow American families to choose the vehicle that best fits their budget and needs,” Joyce remarked, underscoring his commitment to consumer choice.

Understanding the Congressional Review Act

A resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act provides lawmakers with a formal mechanism to oppose unilateral regulations established by federal agencies. This act was designed to empower Congress to review and potentially retract executive decisions that may not have received adequate legislative scrutiny.

In December 2024, just prior to the end of his presidency, Joe Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved a pivotal waiver for California. This waiver enables the state to phase out the sales of new gas-powered vehicles by 2035, aligning with its aggressive climate change objectives.

Concerns from Automakers and Climate Change Advocates

This significant approval came despite apprehensions raised earlier in the same year by major automakers who questioned the practicality of California’s ambitious targets. Nonetheless, proponents within the state have asserted that such a measure is essential for combating climate change effectively.

Supporters of the Biden administration argued that the waiver should be considered an order rather than a mere regulatory change. This perspective implies that the decision would not be subject to congressional review, potentially limiting the legislative branch’s power in this domain.

The Ongoing Standoff

The waiver has sparked controversy and contention since its approval. The prior Trump administration initiated a Congressional review in late February of this year, signaling its intention to repeal the waiver under the GOP-controlled Congress. However, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently stated that California’s waiver is exempt from the Congressional Review Act, complicating efforts to challenge it.

Despite this setback, proponents of the Trump administration’s position insist that the legislative branch must have the final say regarding agency rules. They argue that Congress bears the constitutional responsibility to review such agency actions.

Tom Pyle, the American Energy Alliance President, commented, “Despite misleading reports, the Congressional Review Act is crystal clear: once an agency action is submitted to Congress, it is Congress—and Congress alone—that holds the unassailable power to approve or disapprove that action.” He further emphasized that the GAO’s advisory role does not equate to legal authority to prevent Congress from fulfilling its constitutional obligations.

Looking Ahead: The Future of the Resolution

Joyce’s resolution represents the first critical step in testing the waters regarding this contentious issue. With the House Energy & Commerce Committee’s backing, the legislation is poised to receive considerable support from Republican lawmakers, which may pave the way for a broader political battle as the 2024 elections approach.

The implications of this resolution extend beyond California, as it could set a precedent affecting states nationwide that are looking to implement similar environmental regulations. As discussions continue, stakeholders from various sectors—including the automotive, environmental, and legislative communities—will closely monitor developments in Congress.

As the debate unfolds, the clash between state-level climate initiatives and federal oversight raises fundamental questions about the direction of U.S. environmental policy. The outcome of this legislative effort could have lasting ramifications on consumer choice, environmental strategies, and the future of the automotive industry in America.