Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

ABC News correspondent Matt Gutman has faced significant backlash for describing text messages sent by the alleged assassin of Charlie Kirk to his transgender partner as “very touching.” This comment came during a press conference announcing murder charges against 22-year-old Tyler Robinson.
Gutman highlighted the specific nature of the messages, noting their revelation about the murder weapon. He stated, “But also, it was very touching in a way that many of us didn’t expect. A very intimate portrait into this relationship between the suspect’s roommate and the suspect himself, with him repeatedly calling his roommate, who is transitioning, ‘my love’ and ‘I want to protect you, my love.’” His choice of words aimed to humanize the suspect while addressing a serious criminal case.
During the press briefing, Gutman elaborated on the duality of Robinson’s behavior. He said, “So, it was this duality of someone who the attorney said not only jeopardized the life of Charlie Kirk and the crowd but was doing it in front of children, which is one of the aggravating circumstances of this case. Then, on the other hand, he was speaking so lovingly about his partner, which made for a very interesting press conference.”
Gutman’s comments quickly gained traction on social media, attracting a wave of criticism from viewers and public figures alike. Many deemed his remarks inappropriate, sparking debate about the creation of narratives surrounding violent crimes.
Senator Jim Banks from Indiana reacted with disbelief, stating, “Wait, what???” Others echoed similar sentiments, expressing shock at the juxtaposition of romantic sentiments in a discussion of a murder case. New York Post columnist Karol Markowicz responded with a simple but effective, “Wtaf.”
Just The News correspondent Jerry Dunleavy remarked on the topic via Twitter, emphasizing the peculiarity of Gutman’s framing. “@MattGutmanABC the new front runner for worst take of the day, and that’s an impressive feat today,” he wrote. This sentiment resonated widely, with criticisms encapsulating the perception that mainstream media improperly romanticizes violence when LGBTQ+ individuals are involved.
In his livestream comments, Gutman referred to the situation as “heartbreaking on so many levels,” suggesting a human quality to the events surrounding Kirk’s murder. He stated, “I don’t think I’ve ever experienced a press conference in which we’ve read text messages that are A, so fulsome, so robust, so apparently, allegedly self-incriminating and yet, on the other hand, so touching.” Gutman relayed the depth of feeling in Robinson’s exchanges with his roommate, suggesting they paint a complex picture of the suspect.
Robinson’s texts to Lance Twiggs, who identifies as a woman, included personal affirmations and requests to keep sensitive information confidential. On multiple occasions, Robinson addressed Twiggs affectionately, stating, “I am still ok my love, but am stuck in orem for a little while longer yet. Shouldn’t be long until I can come home, but I gotta grab my rifle still. To be honest I had hoped to keep this secret till I died of old age. I am sorry to involve you.” Such messages have inevitably complicated public perceptions of the relationship dynamics at play.
Utah County Attorney Jeff Gray announced that Robinson faces multiple charges, including aggravated murder. The indictment reveals text exchanges between Robinson and Twiggs that offer insight into Robinson’s mental state at the time leading up to the crime.
In a troubling line of communication, Twiggs expressed concern for Robinson’s whereabouts after he allegedly committed the crime. “you weren’t the one who did it right????” Twiggs asked. To this, Robinson replied, “I am, I’m sorry.” These confessions raise further questions regarding accountability and the motivations behind such tragic events, adding layers to the narrative surrounding crime, love, and betrayal.
The media’s approach to high-profile crime cases often sparks debate. Some argue that romanticizing violent incidents, especially those involving marginalized communities, can lead to dangerous narratives. Critics assert that journalists have a responsibility to report sensitively on such matters, considering the potential implications of their words.
Additionally, many believe that the intersection of love and crime deserves careful examination to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes. As societal discussions around gun violence, public safety, and LGBTQ+ rights continue to evolve, accurate and respectful reporting will be crucial.
As reactions to Gutman’s commentary continue to surface, the debate emphasizes the fine line that journalists must navigate when covering violent crime, personal relationships, and public safety. While it is essential to honor the human elements of a story, it is equally vital to consider the broader societal implications.
Moving forward, media outlets must strive for a balance that respects the complexities of human emotions without sacrificing the gravity of criminal acts. This case serves as a poignant reminder of the responsibility journalists hold in shaping public discourse and maintaining integrity in reporting.
ABC News has not yet issued a public response to the criticism directed at Gutman. As the investigation into Charlie Kirk’s murder unfolds, the media will undoubtedly continue to scrutinize how narratives are crafted in the aftermath of tragedy.