Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
A significant court hearing will occur in Manhattan federal court this Wednesday. The hearing challenges the detention of Mahmoud Khalil, identified as one of the primary organizers of anti-Israel protests at Columbia University last year. The Trump administration is pursuing Khalil’s deportation.
On Saturday, ICE agents apprehended Khalil in his university-provided apartment on the Upper West Side of New York City. The agents informed him that they were in the process of revoking his green card and student visa. This information comes from Khalil’s attorney, Amy Greer.
Following his arrest, Khalil was transported to a detention facility in Louisiana.
The Department of Homeland Security has expressed that this arrest was necessary for protecting national security. Officials allege that Khalil participated in actions supporting Hamas, an organization designated as terrorist by the U.S. government.
District Judge Jesse Furman, from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, is slated to hear Khalil’s case at approximately 11:30 a.m. His legal team has filed motions claiming that ICE violated Khalil’s constitutional rights, seeking both his return to New York and an end to his detention.
While Judge Furman holds the authority to order Khalil’s release, it remains uncertain whether he will take such action. Meanwhile, the judge has instructed that Khalil should not be deported pending the outcomes of the legal challenge presented by his attorneys.
Reports from the lawyer indicate that Khalil’s wife, an American citizen, is currently eight months pregnant. She has expressed deep concern over her husband’s detention and its implications on their family.
Greer stated, “We will vigorously pursue Mahmoud’s rights in court and will continue our efforts to rectify this grave and calculated wrong committed against him.” This reflects a strong commitment to ensuring Khalil’s legal rights are adequately defended.
Civil rights advocates, alongside Khalil’s legal team, assert that the government is unconstitutionally leveraging its immigration enforcement powers to suppress Khalil’s freedom of speech. His detention has sparked protests throughout Manhattan this week, drawing attention to perceived governmental overreach.
Notably, Khalil acted as a spokesperson for the Columbia protesters during key demonstrations last year. Although he has not received any formal criminal charges, the upcoming hearing could provide crucial insights into the circumstances surrounding his arrest and the government’s rationale for continued detention.
Khalil’s attorneys alongside civil rights groups argue that his detention is a direct form of retaliation for his outspoken views. A joint document submitted by Khalil’s legal team and the government preceding the Wednesday hearing indicated that the government plans to argue that the Southern District of New York does not hold jurisdiction over the case.
This assertion could complicate Khalil’s efforts to contest his detention and may shift the case to different venues, depending on the judge’s ruling.
Khalil completed the requirements for a master’s degree at Columbia University in December. His legal representatives have indicated that he has familial roots in Palestine and was raised in Syria. His grandfather was among those forced to leave their homeland.
During last year’s protests, Khalil was notably involved in organizing efforts with the Columbia University Apartheid Divest movement, a coalition of student groups that advocated for university divestment from Israel.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt backed the Trump administration’s strategy to arrest Khalil, asserting that he had been distributing pro-Hamas propaganda on campus. Leavitt emphasized the administration’s strict stance against any form of support for terrorism.
During a recent press briefing, she stated, “This administration will not tolerate individuals benefiting from studying in our country while endorsing pro-terrorist organizations that have harmed Americans. We maintain a zero-tolerance policy regarding support for terrorism, period.”
The resolution regarding Khalil’s immigration status will follow a separate process, overseen by an immigration judge who will decide whether to revoke his green card.
Meanwhile, reports from abc news highlight Khalil’s wife’s claims that he reached out to Columbia University for legal assistance just a day before his arrest. She stated that he felt keen anxiety over potential ICE involvement, pleading for urgent help.
His wife alleges that during the arrest, she faced threats of arrest when she insisted on remaining with her husband while agents took him away. According to her, they were not shown a warrant, indicating a breach of protocol in the arrest process.
As this situation continues to unfold, the implications for Khalil’s case extend beyond his immediate circumstances, raising broader questions around free speech, civil rights, and government accountability.
Contributions for this report were made by various news outlets, including Fox News and the Associated Press.