Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Social media users have unleashed a wave of criticism against California Governor Gavin Newsom after he unveiled plans for a new podcast. The announcement, which Governor Newsom shared via a video post on X, was met with skepticism and mockery from prominent critics who highlighted the state’s ongoing struggles during his leadership.
One conservative commentator, Paul Szypula, voiced his discontent on X, stating, “California is a burnt mess that’s wallowing in financial ruin. So, Gavin Newsom naturally launches a podcast. WTH!” This sentiment reflects a broader frustration among citizens who feel that the governor should focus more on pressing state issues rather than engaging in media ventures.
The podcast, titled “This is Gavin Newsom,” promises to deviate from traditional political programming. Newsom characterized it as an “anything but the ordinary ‘politician’ podcast” and it is set to feature guests with whom he may have significant disagreements, as well as individuals he admires. He emphasized that the show would tackle crucial topics impacting Americans, including inflation and tariffs.
During his video announcement, Newsom asked pointed questions, such as, “What’s going on with the cost of eggs? What are the impacts – the real impacts – to you around tariffs?” This approach signals an intention to pursue substantive discussions that resonate with everyday citizens.
Notably, he also mentioned plans to invite leaders from the MAGA movement in the initial episodes, which could create an intriguing dynamic considering his political stance. This podcast is produced by iHeartMedia and represents Governor Newsom’s second foray into the podcasting arena. He currently co-hosts the “Politickin’” podcast alongside former NFL player Marshawn Lynch and sports agent Doug Hendrickson.
Despite his optimistic tone, many users on X expressed dissatisfaction with Newsom’s podcast news. They took to social media to air grievances about the governor’s perceived neglect of critical issues.
Among the critiques, Barstool Sports founder Dave Portnoy alluded to Newsom’s controversial dinner at The French Laundry during the pandemic. He questioned the governor’s decision to hold a maskless gathering at an upscale restaurant while California enforced some of the nation’s strictest COVID-19 restrictions. Portnoy’s comment underlines the ongoing tensions between the governor’s personal actions and public expectations during crises.
In 2023, Newsom publicly apologized for the 2020 incident, acknowledging it as a “dumb mistake” that many Californians have not forgotten. His prior actions continue to resurface in discussions about his leadership and priorities.
Reactions from political figures reflect a growing skepticism about the governor’s motivations. Republican California State Representative Carl DeMaio suggested that a fitting name for the podcast would be “Gaslighting with Gavin.” His quip captures the frustration felt by many who believe that the governor is diverting attention from significant state issues.
Meanwhile, investigative reporter Andrew Kerr expressed interest in appearing on the podcast to discuss Newsom’s administration’s response to wildfires in Los Angeles. Kerr highlighted the perceived inconsistency between the governor’s media outreach and the reality of governmental failures in disaster management.
Critics like The Federalist reporter Brianna Lyman articulated their discontent with the governor’s timing. Lyman tweeted, “Your state is literally in shambles, homelessness is a massive problem, communities are still just ash and you think now is the good time to launch a … podcast?” This underscores the public’s demand for tangible solutions to pressing issues rather than media appearances.
As the governor embarks on this new media journey, distrust remains palpable among constituents. California GOP Chair John Dennis went so far as to say, “I’d rather pour acid in my ears than listen to a Gavin Newsom podcast.” Such extreme reactions reveal a significant disconnect between the governor’s public persona and the concerns of many Californians.
In response to the backlash, the Governor’s office has not provided immediate comments to inquiries about the podcast or the criticisms stemming from its announcement. The lack of engagement could further fuel public discontent.
Governor Newsom’s venture into podcasting reflects a larger trend of politicians using media platforms to connect with the public. However, his approach raises important questions about priorities. During a time when California faces numerous challenges, including economic difficulties, homelessness, and environmental crises, the choice to launch a podcast can be perceived as superficial.
As the political climate shifts and communication strategies evolve, Newsom’s podcast could serve as a double-edged sword. While it offers a platform for dialogue, it also risks highlighting the discrepancies between political promises and actions. Moving forward, Californians will be watching closely to see whether this new podcast leads to meaningful conversations or merely another layer of political spin.
While the initial response to Newsom’s podcast has been overwhelmingly critical, its actual impact remains to be seen. The governor’s ability to navigate public sentiment and address pressing issues in his new role as a podcaster may define not only his political future but also his legacy as a leader in California.