Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

The U.S. Attorney General has recently issued a controversial directive regarding the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department, prompting immediate backlash from local officials. The order, delivered by Pam Bondi, seeks to challenge the police department’s existing sanctuary policies and appoint Drug Enforcement Administration Administrator Terrence Cole as the emergency police commissioner for the district.
D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has taken a strong stance against the federal intervention. In a post on social media, she highlighted a letter from District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb, emphasizing that Bondi’s order is unlawful. Bowser stated, “There is no statute that conveys the District’s personnel authority to a federal official.”
In the correspondence addressed to MPD Police Chief Pamela Smith, Attorney General Schwalb reiterated his position that Bondi’s directive lacks a legal foundation. He wrote that Chief Smith is “not legally obligated to follow it,” effectively undermining the federal mandate.
Bondi’s decree has significant implications for policing in the nation’s capital. She stated that police leadership must seek approval from Commissioner Cole before issuing any further directives to the MPD. This directive also rescinds an executive order that was recently enacted by Chief Smith.
Furthermore, Bondi suspended parts of two existing general orders “until further notice” and directed the MPD to enforce local regulations strictly. This includes a focus on section 22-1307 of the District of Columbia Code concerning unlawful occupancy of public spaces. These sweeping changes form part of a larger strategy to combat crime in Washington, D.C.
The clash between the federal and local authorities arises in the context of President Donald Trump’s urgent call to address rising crime rates in Washington. Recently, he declared a crime emergency in the capital, mandating that the D.C. Metropolitan Police provide services for federal purposes.
This federal intervention raises questions about the scope of the Home Rule Act. In his letter to Chief Smith, Schwalb stressed that section 740 of the act does not grant the President, or any officials acting on his behalf, the authority to alter the police chief’s position or command structure within the MPD. He argued that the federal government cannot dictate local law enforcement priorities or decisions.
Schwalb asserted that the Bondi order is “ultra vires,” a Latin term meaning beyond the powers. His declaration reiterates the autonomy of the District’s local government in managing its law enforcement agencies without interference from federal authorities.
This ongoing dispute highlights broader concerns regarding public safety and the relationship between federal and local law enforcement agencies. The Mayor and the Attorney General’s resistance to Bondi’s order underscores the tension that often arises when federal and local jurisdictions clash over policing strategies and regulations.
As this situation continues to evolve, it remains essential for all parties involved to prioritize public safety. Local leaders are tasked with balancing the need for effective law enforcement with the legal frameworks that govern their operations.
Ultimately, this dispute serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of maintaining local control over policing while navigating federal interests. Local officials like Mayor Bowser and Attorney General Schwalb argue that local insights and understanding are vital for implementing effective crime reduction strategies.
As the legal and political battles unfold, the residents of Washington, D.C. will be closely observing how this conflict affects their daily lives. The implications of these decisions may have lasting impacts on local governance and law enforcement priorities.
Fox News Digital’s Brooke Singman contributed to this report.